Kramer v. Eaze Inc.
| Daniel Kramer |
| Eaze Inc. |
| 1:2025cv03534 |
| November 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 34 Case Administratively Closed pursuant to #33 ORDER. Text Only Entry. (anewt,) |
Filing 33
ORDER. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration (D. #23 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is instructed to administratively close this case. It is further Ordered that the Parties SHALL update the Court no less often than every 180 days or within ten (10) days of the conclusion of arbitration. By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 4/27/2026. (anewt,)
|
| Filing 32 REPLY to Response to #23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Hance, Kylie) |
|
Filing 31
ORDER granting #30 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply. The Court grants Eaze, Inc. a one-week extension of time to its reply to Plaintiffs Response to Eazes Motion to Compel Arbitration, up to and including January 30, 2026.By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on January 22, 2026. Text Only Entry.(gpglc3)
|
| Filing 30 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Hance, Kylie) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE to #23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Plaintiff Daniel Kramer. (Guesno, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 28 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Daniel Kramer All parties do not consent.. (Guesno, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 27 STATEMENT Plaintiff's Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement by Plaintiff Daniel Kramer. (Guesno, Jacqueline) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER granting #24 Joint Motion to Continue Scheduling Conference. The scheduling conference set for 1/7/2026 and associated deadlines are VACATED. Parties shall contact Chambers within 10 days if the Motion to Compel Arbitration is denied to set up a new date for the scheduling conference. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/19/2025. Text Only Entry(stvlc7, )
|
| Filing 25 MEMORANDUM regarding #24 Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference filed by Eaze Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 12/19/2025. Text Only Entry (dclem) |
| Filing 24 Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Hance, Kylie) |
| Filing 23 MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Ex. A. - Employment Agreement)(Hance, Kylie) |
|
Filing 22
ORDER granting #20 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Eaze Inc.'s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED to January 7, 2026. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 12/3/2025. Text Only Entry(stvlc7, )
|
| Filing 21 MEMORANDUM regarding #20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #19 Complaint filed by Eaze Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on December 3, 2025. Text Only Entry. (gpglc3) |
| Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #19 Complaint by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Hance, Kylie) |
| Filing 19 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand filed on behalf of Plaintiff Daniel Kramer.(jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #13 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to Seal Doc. 5 and File Redacted Complaint and Jury Demand. The Clerk of Court is instructed to file the #5 unredacted version of Plaintiff's Complaint under Level 1 Restriction and to accept the [13-1] redacted version of Plaintiff's Complaint and enter it on the docket. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/17/2025. Text Only Entry(stvlc7, )
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant Eaze Inc.'s deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is EXTENDED to December 3, 2025. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/12/2025. Text Only Entry(stvlc7, )
|
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #5 Complaint filed by Eaze Inc.Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 11/12/2025. Text Only Entry (dclem) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #5 Complaint by Defendant Eaze Inc.. (Hance, Kylie) |
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM regarding #13 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Seal Doc. 5 and File Redacted Complaint and Jury Demand #5 Complaint filed by Daniel Kramer. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 11/12/2025. Text Only Entry (dclem) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Seal Doc. 5 and File Redacted Complaint and Jury Demand #5 Complaint by Plaintiff Daniel Kramer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Redacted Complaint and Jury Demand)(Guesno, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Hance, Kylie) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. IT IS ORDERED: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Local Civil Rule 16.1, the Court shall hold a scheduling conference on: January 7, 2026 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom A-402, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. On or before December 31, 2025, the parties shall file a joint proposed scheduling order in the form required pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. By Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/06/2025. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court levsponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 11/6/2025. Text Only Entry (sphil, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Jacqueline Guesno by Jacqueline Raquel Guesno on behalf of Daniel KramerAttorney Jacqueline Raquel Guesno added to party Daniel Kramer(pty:pla) (Guesno, Jacqueline) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Complaint and Jury Demand, Civil Case Procedures Order, District Court Civil Summons, and District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet upon Eaze Inc. on 10/15/2025.(eguth, ) |
| Filing 5 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Eaze Inc., filed by Daniel Kramer.(eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kylie Tomiko Hance on behalf of Eaze Inc.Attorney Kylie Tomiko Hance added to party Eaze Inc.(pty:dft) (Hance, Kylie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Eaze Inc. from Colorado State Court, District of Weld County, Case Number 2025CV31007. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10648669), filed by Eaze Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Service of Process, #2 Exhibit B - General Counsel Offer Letter, #3 Exhibit C - Offboarding Documents, #4 Exhibit D - Where Eaze Delivers, #5 Exhibit E - Terms of Service, #6 Civil Cover Sheet Federal Civil Cover Sheet, #7 SC Civil Case Procedures Order, #8 SC Complaint and Jury Demand, #9 SC CV Case Cover Sheet, #10 SC Summons, #11 SC Information Regarding Cases, #12 SC Affidavit of Service on Eaze_Inc served_on_10_15_2025, #13 SC Entry of Appearance)(Hafer, Edward) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Kramer v. Eaze Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Kramer | |
| Represented By: | Jacqueline Raquel Guesno |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eaze Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Edward J. Hafer |
| Represented By: | Kylie Tomiko Hance |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
