Robledo (PS) v. Lorenz et al
Plaintiff: C. S. Robledo
Defendant: Krislene Lorenz, Randall Arp, James Butler and Attorney General of Colorado
Case Number: 1:2025cv03635
Filed: November 12, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/23/2026. Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Pay Filing Fee (ECF No. #18 ) is DENIED because payment of the filing fee would not cure all of the deficiencies and does not excuse Plaintiffs failure to cure the deficiencies within the time allowed. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
March 17, 2026 Filing 18 MOTION for Leave to Pay Filing Fee by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (eluce, )
February 23, 2026 Filing 17 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #16 Order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
February 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER it is ORDERED that the Motion to Set Aside Dismissal Order (ECF No. #14 ) and the Combined Motion to Reconsider and Motion to Reinstate (ECF No. #13 ) are DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #15 ) is denied as moot. It isFURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter a Judgment in this action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/23/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
February 17, 2026 Filing 15 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (jrobe, )
February 17, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION to Set Aside Dismissal Order by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (jrobe, )
February 17, 2026 Filing 13 Combined Motion to Reconsider and Motion to Reinstate by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (jrobe, )
January 23, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF DISMISSAL it is ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure all of the deficiencies. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. 9), the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. 10), and the Motion to Exceed Page Limitations (ECF No. 11) are denied as moot. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 01/23/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
January 20, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Exceed Page Limitations by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (agarc, )
January 20, 2026 Filing 10 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (agryan)
January 5, 2026 Filing 9 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (agryan)
December 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER Plaintiff's "Motion for Extension of Time" (ECF No. #7 ) filed December 16, 2025, is DENIED as moot. Plaintiff already has been granted additional time until January 12, 2026, to cure the deficiencies. (See ECF No. #5 .) by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/18/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
December 16, 2025 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (jrobe, )
December 16, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (jrobe, )
December 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER Plaintiff's address has been updated and Plaintiff's request to stay proceedings, which the Court construes as a motion for extension of time, is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff shall have up to and including January 12, 2026, to cure the deficiencies as directed in the Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #3 ). Plaintiff is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if all of the deficiencies are not curedwithin the time allowed. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Plaintiff, together with a copy of this Minute Order, a copy of the Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #3 ) entered in this action on November 13, 2025. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/11/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
December 9, 2025 Filing 4 Emergency Notice of Address Change and Motion to Stay Proceedings by Plaintiff C. S. Robledo. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter)(jrobe, )
November 13, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty(30) days from the date of this order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/13/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
November 12, 2025 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eguth, )
November 12, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Randall Arp, Attorney General of Colorado, James Butler, Krislene Lorenz, filed by C. S. Robledo.(eguth, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robledo (PS) v. Lorenz et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: C. S. Robledo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Krislene Lorenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Randall Arp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Butler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General of Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?