Strege (PS) v. Launch all Nuclear Missiles et al
| Adam Strege |
| Launch all Nuclear Missiles, All Planets Nuclear Missiles, Nate Long, Nate (I) Long, Ben Cooper, Criss Kopp, Criss (I) Kopp, Steve Ansel, Steve (I) Ansel, Steve Beruj, Steve (I) Beruj, Fay Mathews, Fay (I) Mathews, Starbucks Coffee, David Steiner, David (I) Steiner, Acses Heath, God Loves Us, God Loves you, God Hates us, God Heaven, God Hell, All Space Planets, All Planets People, All Planets Sun Light, All Planets Atoms, Satan, All Planets, All Space Planets Courts all Planets Police and law enforcement, all Planets Military and All Planets Computers |
| 1:2025cv03897 |
| December 4, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 40 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #33 MOTION to Reopen Case Addressed to Adam Strege. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 39 USCA Case Number 26-1185 for #37 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 38 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #37 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed, IFP status on appeal denied in final order) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record and Docket Sheet)(echa, ) |
| Filing 37 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #34 Order on Motion for Reconsideration,,, Order on Motion to Reopen Case,, by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 36 MANDATE of USCA as to #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege, #26 USCA Order/Opinion/Judgment: The court's April 20, 2026 judgment takes effect this date. With the issuance of this letter, jurisdiction is transferred back to the lower court. (USCA Case No. 26-1026) (echa, ) |
| Filing 35 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 30 Pro Se E-Filing Privileges Termed at Case Closure, #31 MOTION for Reconsideration re #29 Order Dismissing Case, Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
Filing 34
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/6/2026. Plaintiff's motions (ECF No. #31 & #33 ) are DENIED. The requests to reconsider and reopen are moot because Plaintiff fails to identify any common question of law or fact that would justify consolidating this case with case number 26-cv-00417- RTG. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a). The request for extension of time also is moot because the instant action is closed. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
| Filing 33 MOTION to Reopen Case by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 32 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #26 USCA Order/Opinion/Judgment,, Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 31 MOTION for Reconsideration by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 30 TERMINATION OF PRO SE E-FILING PRIVILEGES: This case is now closed; therefore, e-filing privileges have been terminated for Adam Strege, Plaintiff. (Text Only Entry) (echa, ) |
|
Filing 29
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/24/2026. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. #28 ), which the Court construes as a notice of voluntary dismissal, is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 28 Tenth MOTION for Order to by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (Strege, Adam) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF PRO SE E-FILING PRIVILEGES: Plaintiff, Adam Strege, sought and received e-filing privileges on 4/21/2026. All further service will be effectuated electronically via CM/ECF to the email address of record. This is being granted in relation to ECF #26 USCA Order and Judgment. (Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 26 USCA Order and Judgement as to #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege : (USCA Case No. 26-1026) (This document is not the Mandate) We withdraw our March 24, 2026 Order and Judgment and replace it with the attached Order and Judgment, which shall be filed as of today's date. We vacate the district courts Rule 41(b) dismissal and remand for further proceedings. We also grant Mr. Streges motion to proceed ifp. (Attachments: #1 USCA Letter)(echa, ) Modified on 4/20/2026 to add full order (echa, ). |
| Filing 25 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 23 Appeal Record Sent to USCA Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 24 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #18 Order on Motion for Order, #17 MOTION for Order to Addressed to Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (echa, ) |
| Filing 23 RECORD ON APPEAL filed as to #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege. Volume I - Pleadings; filed by the Tenth Circuit (USCA Case No. 26-1026). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 22 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #14 USCA Case Number Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #12 Letter Transmitting Notice of Appeal, #11 Notice of Appeal, #15 Notice (Other) Addressed to Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Envelope) (echa, ) |
| Filing 20 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #10 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
| Filing 19 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #9 MOTION for Reconsideration Addressed to Adam Strege. (echa, ) |
|
Filing 18
Minute Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 02/05/2026. Plaintiff's Motion (ECF No. #17 ) filed February 4, 2026, is DENIED because it is not clear what Plaintiff is requesting. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 17 MOTION by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 16 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #8 Clerk's Judgment, and #7 Order Addressed to Adam Strege 10403 Hidden Mesa Road Austin, CO. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Plaintiff Adam Strege (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 14 USCA Case Number 26-1026 for #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 12 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #11 Notice of Appeal filed by Adam Strege to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record)(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Clerk's Judgment and #7 Order by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 22 January 2026. ORDERED that the motion to reconsider (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 13 REASSIGNING JUDGE. Pursuant to ECF #7 , this action is reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order on 13 January 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 13 January 2026. ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure the deficiencies within the time allowed. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Addressed to Adam Strege re #5 . (pklin, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION Electronically file all court documents by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4 December 2025. ORDERED that Plaintiff cure all of the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) by Plaintiff Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Acses Heath, All Planets, All Planets Atoms, All Planets Computers, All Planets Nuclear Missiles, All Planets People, All Planets Sun Light, All Space Planets, All Space Planets Courts all Planets Police and law enforcement, Steve (I) Ansel, Steve Ansel, Steve Beruj, Steve (I) Beruj, Ben Cooper, God Hates us, God Heaven, God Hell, God Loves Us, God Loves you, Criss Kopp, Criss (I) Kopp, Launch all Nuclear Missiles, Nate Long, Nate (I) Long, Fay (I) Mathews, Fay Mathews, Satan, Starbucks Coffee, David (I) Steiner, David Steiner, all Planets Military, filed by Adam Strege. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Envelope)(eguth, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
