Meza (PS) et al v. Reams et al
| Juan Meza and Moises Rodriguez-Nunez |
| Steve Reams and Philip J. Weiser |
| Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr. |
| 1:2025cv04065 |
| December 18, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #6 Order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies as directed and failure to prosecute. It isFURTHER ORDERED that the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in formapauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. UnitedStates, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Applicants files a notice of appeal, they must also pay the full appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. It is FURTHER ORDERED that that no certificate of appealability will issue because Applicants have not made a substantial showing that jurists of reason would debate the correctness of this procedural ruling. It is FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 01/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING NEXT FRIEND TO SHOW CAUSE AND CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/23/2025. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if the designated deficiencies are not cured within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, this action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent the "Motion for Next Friend Requesting for Order to Show Cause Why to Be Allowed to Proceed" (ECF No. 3) is requesting for Court Orders in this action be sent to Merrival as well as Applicants, the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is ordered to send all court orders in this action to Applicants and to Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr., at: 2110 O Street, Greeley, CO 80631. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Next Friend Requesting for Order to Show Cause Why to be Allowed to Proceed by Petitioners Juan Meza, Moises Rodriguez-Nunez. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioners Juan Meza, Moises Rodriguez-Nunez. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2242 "Next Friend", filed by Petitioners Juan Meza, Moises Rodriguez-Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(echa, ) Modified to correct filers on 12/18/2025 (echa, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
