Perri v. Weiser
| Joel Perri |
| Philip J Weiser |
| 1:2025cv04121 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 RESPONSE to #22 MOTION for Leave to filed by Defendant Philip J Weiser. (Buckley, Emily) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM regarding #22 MOTION for Leave to filed by Joel Perri. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 5/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (anewt,) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Joel Perri. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Third Amended Complaint)(anewt,) |
| Filing 21 REPLY to Response to #18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Dkt. 13 filed by Defendant Philip J Weiser. (Buckley, Emily) |
| Filing 20 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE in Opposition to #18 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Joel Perri. (anewt,) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM regarding #18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Dkt. 13 filed by Philip J Weiser. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 04/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (dclem) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint Dkt. 13 by Defendant Philip J Weiser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Buckley, Emily) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Philip J Weiser. Served on 4/8/2026, answer due 4/29/2026. (anewt,) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #13 Amended Complaint for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Marshal Service Form) (anewt,) |
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re: #13 Amended Complaint for Service of Process. (amona,) |
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court levsponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on 3/19/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (amona,)
|
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against Philip J Weiser, filed by Joel Perri.(eluce, ) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: The Amended Complaint (D. 8) is entirely deficient because it does not comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The twin purposes of a complaint are to give the opposing parties fair notice of the basis for the claims against them so that they may respond and to allow the court to conclude that the allegations, if proven, show that the plaintiff is entitled to relief. See Monument Builders of Greater Kansas City, Inc. v. American Cemetery Assn of Kansas, 891 F.2d 1473, 1480 (10th Cir. 1989). The requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 are designed to meet these purposes. See TV Communications Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 1062, 1069 (D. Colo. 1991), affd, 964 F.2d 1022 (10th Cir. 1992). Specifically, Rule 8(a) provides that a complaint "must contain (1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the courts jurisdiction,... (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and (3) a demand for the relief sought." The philosophy of Rule 8(a) is reinforced by Rule 8(d)(1), which provides that "[e]ach allegation must be simple, concise, and direct." Taken together, Rules 8(a) and (d)(1) underscore the emphasis placed on clarity and brevity by the federal pleading rules. Prolix, vague, or unintelligible pleadings violate Rule 8. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff must file a Second Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days which comports with the rules and gives some reasonable description of what occurred and the basis for this Court's purported jurisdiction over the matter. Failure to timely file a Second Amended Complaint will result in closure of this action. So Ordered.By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on March 10, 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (gpglc3)
|
|
Filing 11
Pursuant to ECF #9 Order Drawing Case, ECF #7 Motion to Waive Fees is denied. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/10/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (Text Only Entry) (ggill, )
|
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DRAWING CASE. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the Court has determined that this case does not appear appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that that this case be DRAWN to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Waive Fees (ECF No. #7 ), filed on January 2, 2026, is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action on December 23, 2025. (See ECF No. #5 ). (Case randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara for all further proceedings. All future pleadings shall be designated to 25-cv-04121-GPG). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/10/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 8 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against Philip J Weiser, filed by Joel Perri.(ggill, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Waive Fees by Plaintiff Joel Perri. (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days from the date of this Order, an amended Complaint on the court-approved general Complaint form. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/02/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED as not filed on the correct form. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/23/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(ggill, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 3 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Joel Perri. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Joel Perri. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF against Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Director of the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Philip J Weiser, filed by Joel Perri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dhern, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Perri v. Weiser | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joel Perri | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Philip J Weiser | |
| Represented By: | Emily B. Buckley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
