Bright v. Rebel Bread LLC
Plaintiff: Martina Bright
Defendant: Rebel Bread LLC
Case Number: 1:2025cv04196
Filed: December 29, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: S Kato Crews
Referring Judge: Kathryn A Starnella
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2026 Filing 20 NOTICE of Settlement and Motion to Dismiss by Plaintiff Martina Bright (Bryant, Raymond)
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER On January 1, 2026, this Court revised its Standing Order for Civil Cases. As of January 1, the procedure for filing motions for summary judgment is as follows: No later than 10 days after the close of discovery, a party intending to file a motion for summary judgment must meaningfully confer with the opposing party and jointly contact chambers by email to set a pre-motion status conference with the Court. See SKC Standing Order Civ. C(4)(c). Therefore, the dispositive motion deadline previously set is VACATED. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/13/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 4/13/26. Pursuant to the entry of #17 Scheduling Order, the Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/26 is hereby VACATED. Counsel to refer to Judge Crews' Practice Standards to obtain future court dates. Text Only Entry (lgale, )
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 4/13/26. Designation of Affirmative Experts due 8/20/2026. Designation of Rebuttal Experts due 9/21/2026. Discovery due by 10/20/2026. Dispositive Motions due by 11/20/2026. (lgale, )
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 13 April 2026. This matter is before the Court on the parties Joint Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Protective Order [#11 ] (the "Motion"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#11 ] is GRANTED. The Protective Order [#11 -1] supplied by the parties is accepted and entered as an Order of the Court as of the date of this Minute Order.(echa, )
April 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 13 April 2026.(echa, )
April 8, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/8/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
April 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 6 April 2026. This matter is before the Court on the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction [#12 ] (the "Consent/Non-Consent Form"). This case was assigned to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c). The signed Consent/Non-Consent Form [#12 ] indicates that at least one party has declined to consent. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case shall be assigned to a District Judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(8) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a). (Case randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for all further proceedings). (anewt,)
April 6, 2026 Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Martina Bright All parties do not consent.. (Oliver, Audrey)
April 6, 2026 Filing 11 Joint MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff Martina Bright. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Stipulated Protective Order)(Oliver, Audrey)
April 6, 2026 Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Martina Bright. (Oliver, Audrey)
February 17, 2026 Filing 9 Defendant Rebel Bread LLC, ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rebel Bread LLC.(Schmalzel, Katryn)
January 30, 2026 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John-Paul C. Sauer on behalf of Rebel Bread LLCAttorney John-Paul C. Sauer added to party Rebel Bread LLC(pty:dft) (Sauer, John-Paul)
January 30, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Katryn Emma Schmalzel on behalf of Rebel Bread LLCAttorney Katryn Emma Schmalzel added to party Rebel Bread LLC(pty:dft) (Schmalzel, Katryn)
January 26, 2026 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Rebel Bread LLC. Rebel Bread LLC waiver sent on 1/26/2026, answer due 3/27/2026. (Schmalzel, Katryn)
December 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 30 December 2025. (cmadr, )
December 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 30 December 2025. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/7/2026. Scheduling Conference set for 4/14/2026 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document) (cmadr, )
December 30, 2025 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, )
December 29, 2025 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (eguth, )
December 29, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rebel Bread LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10736413)Attorney Audrey DeRose Oliver added to party Martina Bright(pty:pla), filed by Martina Bright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Oliver, Audrey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bright v. Rebel Bread LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martina Bright
Represented By: Audrey DeRose Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rebel Bread LLC
Represented By: Katryn Emma Schmalzel
Represented By: John-Paul C. Sauer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?