Bradberry v. Department of the Air Force et al
| Camerron L. Bradberry |
| Department of the Air Force and Troy Meink |
| 1:2026cv00055 |
| January 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 RETURN of Service upon the United States Attorney General. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 32 MEMORANDUM regarding #31 MOTION to Clarify filed by Camerron L. Bradberry. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 06/02/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
| Filing 31 Plaintiff's Notice of Compliance and Request for Clarification of Conflicting Administrative Actions by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (ggill, ) |
Filing 30
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to the Order of Reference, the Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on August 27, 2026, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom C-402, on the fourth floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. This will be an in-person proceeding. No later than seven days before the Scheduling Conference, the Parties shall (1) file their Proposed Scheduling Order onto the case docket sheet and (2) jointly email a Word copy of the proposed Scheduling Order, copying all Parties, to Chambers at #o'[email protected]. By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 5/27/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 29 CLERK'S NOTE REGARDING DEFAULT. #27 & #28 Defaults will not be entered as to Department of the Air Force as: no proof of service has been filed, by Clerk. Please see ECF 24 Minute Order. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) |
| Filing 28 Plaintiff's Renewed MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #3 Supplemental Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Damages, #4 Omnibus Universal Statement of Damages, #5 Consolidated Statement of All Damages, #6 AI Certification)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 27 Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only), #3 Omnibus Universal Statement of Damages, #4 Consolidated Statement of All Damages, #5 AI Certification, #6 Supplemental Memorandum of Points)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 26 RETURN of Service upon the United States Attorney's Office. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 25 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #10 Second Amended Complaint, 24 Minute Order, for service of process. (Attachments: #1 Summons Department of the Air Force (DC), #2 Summons Department of the Air Force (MD), #3 Certified Mail Receipts Department of the Air Force (DC), #4 Certified Mail Receipts Department of the Air Force (MD), #5 Certified Mail Receipts U.S. Attorney General's Office) (ggill, ) Modified on 5/21/2026 to correct addresses (ggill, ). |
|
Filing 24
MINUTE ORDER: Upon review of the docket, the Clerk of Court is directed to complete service on the United States Department of the Air Force, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and Rule 4(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court notes that it cannot proceed with entry of default until all Defendants have been served. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 5/19/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (nywlc8, )
|
| Filing 23 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTE REGARDING DEFAULT. Default will not be entered as to Department of the Air Force, Troy Meink re #21 MOTION for Entry of Default as to: the affidavit or declaration concerning defendant(s) military status required by Service Members Civil Relief Act was not filed as to Troy Meink, no proof of service has been filed as to the Department of the Air Force, by Clerk. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) |
| Filing 21 Plaintiff's MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) by Camerron L. Bradberry. (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER: The #18 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and #19 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment are DENIED without prejudice. "Entry of a default judgment involves a two-step process." Meyers v. Pfizer, Inc., 581 F. App'x 708, 710 (10th Cir. 2014) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a)-(b)). "If the defendant fails to timely respond to the complaint, the plaintiff can request entry of a default by the court clerk" under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) (providing that entry of default is appropriate against any party who "has failed to plead or otherwise defend" against an affirmative request for relief). "If the clerk enters a default, the plaintiff can [then] ask the court to grant a default judgment." Meyers, 581 F. App'x at 710 (emphasis added). Here, Plaintiff has not completed the first step of process--i.e., he has not requested that the Clerk of Court enter a clerk's entry of default under Rule 55(a) or obtained a clerk's entry of default. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motions for Entry of Default Judgment are premature and must be denied without prejudice. See Ward v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., No. 18-cv-00232-CMA-STV, 2019 WL 7630812, at *1 (D. Colo. June 26, 2019). In addition, Plaintiff is directed to this Court's Standing Order Regarding the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence ("AI") in Court Filings, which is available on the District of Colorado's website. The Standing Order requires that "[e]very filing shall contain an AI Certification regarding the use, or non-use, of generative AI (such as ChatGPT, Harvey.AI, or Google Gemini) in preparing the filing." Plaintiff is also reminded that although he proceeds pro se, he remains obligated to comply with the requirements of this Court's Standing Order and Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All Parties are advised that future filings that do not comply with the Standing Order may be stricken. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 05/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 19 Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit J, #10 Exhibit K, #11 Exhibit L)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 18 Plaintiff's MOTION for Entry of Default Judgment by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Exhibit)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Troy Meink served on 4/3/2026, answer due 4/24/2026. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #10 Second Amended Complaint for service of process. (Attachments: #1 Summons Meink, #2 USMS Meink) (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER. This matter is before the Court on a review of the docket. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The United States Marshal Service shall attempt service on Defendant Troy Meink at the address provided in the Amended Complaint; (2) If Defendant Department of the Air Force must be served at a different address, it is Plaintiff's responsibility to provide that address. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/19/2026. [Per order, requested document was mailed to requested party] For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 03/17/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, )
|
| Filing 15 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER DRAWING CASE After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it isORDERED that this case be DRAWN to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to amagistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 03/16/2026. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-00055-NYW. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER Denying Motion for Protective Order. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. #6 ) is DENIED, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
| Filing 10 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Department of the Air Force, Troy Meink, filed by Camerron L. Bradberry.(jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/20/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 8 Supplemental Statement of Claims by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 It is ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. It isFURTHER ORDERED that the court review the Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service shall serveprocess on any remaining Defendants for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge and/or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 6 Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order and Notice to the Court Regarding Personal Safety, by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against William Bridgemohan, Jacob Brown, Franklin Cheney, Dawn Couey, Department of the Air Force, Joshua Fisher, Rueben Hernandez, Brandon Holliman, Holly Kline, Troy Meink, Jenney Sanchez, Jessica Simpson, Shawn Underhill, filed by Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Order to Cure)(ccuen, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCY by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/07/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Camerron L. Bradberry. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL ACTION against Department of the Air Force, Troy Meink, filed by Camerron L. Bradberry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Exhibit)(eluce, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
