Crosby (PS) v. Warden ADX et al
| Gregory D Crosby and Gregory D. Cosby |
| Warden ADX and North Central Region |
| 1:2026cv00104 |
| January 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER. Applicant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #8 ) is DENIED without prejudice as premature because this case is in initial review, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/28/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agryan)
|
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 5/7/2026. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 9 PETITIONER SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES to Show Cause #5 and Responses as to Successive Petition by Petitioner Gregory D Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Letter, #2 Envelope)(agryan) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Petitioner Gregory D Crosby. (agryan) |
| Filing 7 PETITIONER RESPONSE to Show Cause #5 by Petitioner Gregory D Crosby. (agryan) |
| Filing 6 Letter from Gregory Crosby (agryan) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that Mr. Crosby show cause in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons stated in this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Mr. Crosby fails to show good cause within the time allowed, the application will be denied and the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/5/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ordered that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. Process shall not issue at this time, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/12/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(agryan)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Gregory D Crosby. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Gregory D Crosby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
