Hirst-Roddey v. Walmart Inc.
| Maike S. Hirst-Roddey |
| Walmart Inc. |
| 1:2026cv00314 |
| January 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Walmart Inc.'s ("Walmart") Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #23 ) is GRANTED. Walmart is directed to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #4 ) on or before April 6, 2026. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 03/20/2026.(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM regarding #23 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #19 Amended Complaint filed by Walmart Inc.. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/20/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc10, ) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #19 Amended Complaint by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Mason, Jeana) |
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER: The #21 Defendant Walmart Inc.'s Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is CONSTRUED as the Parties' one stipulation pursuant to Local Rule 6.1(a). Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint on or before March 23, 2026. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 3/6/2026. Text Only Entry(nywlc10, )
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #19 Amended Complaint by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Mason, Jeana) |
| Filing 20 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #19 Amended Complaint filed by attorney Michael Rex. The document is incorrectly formatted. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must clearly identify the correct Federal Court in the caption. (Text Only Entry) (sphil, ) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Maike S. Hirst-Roddey.(Rex, Michael) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Filing by Defendant Walmart Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Mason, Jeana) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Walmart Inc's ("Walmart") Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #11 ) is GRANTED. Walmart is directed to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (ECF No. #4 ) on or before February 23, 2026. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 02/02/2026.(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Michael D. Rex on behalf of Maike S. Hirst-RoddeyAttorney Michael D. Rex added to party Maike S. Hirst-Roddey(pty:pla) (Rex, Michael) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Amanda Francis Owen on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Amanda Francis Owen added to party Maike S. Hirst-Roddey(pty:pla) (Owen, Amanda) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Shawn Alexander Owen on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Shawn Alexander Owen added to party Maike S. Hirst-Roddey(pty:pla) (Owen, Shawn) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brandon T. Holmes on behalf of Walmart Inc.Attorney Brandon T. Holmes added to party Walmart Inc.(pty:dft) (Holmes, Brandon) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #4 Complaint filed by Walmart Inc.. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/29/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc10, ) |
| Filing 11 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #4 Complaint by Defendant Walmart Inc.. (Mason, Jeana) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) shall be held on: April 8, 2026 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294 The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. Five minutes prior to the start of the hearing, the parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (571) 353-2301, Access Code 841686937#. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs counsel: Michael D. Rex, #57898Rex Legal, LLC 950 S. Cherry St., Ste. 1515, Denver, CO, 80246 Shawn A. Owens, #52270 Amanda Francis Owen, #45101Francis Owen LLC 3200 Cherry Creek South Dr., Ste. 520, Denver, CO 80209. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the First and Final Notice to All Attorney(s) and Unrepresented Parties in Removed, Transferred or Other Cases (ECF No. 3 ) entered on January 26, 2026. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 01/29/2026. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 9 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Mason, Jeana) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at his discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 1/27/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc10, )
|
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eluce, ) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (eluce, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Service of Complaint and Summons upon Walmart Inc. on 1/5/2026 (eluce, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES & JURY DEMAND against Walmart Inc., filed by Maike S. Hirst-Roddey.(eluce, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (eluce, ) |
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (eluce, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart Inc. from DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO, Case Number 2025CV34790. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number BCODC-10783943), filed by Walmart Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit B Notice of Removal, #3 Exhibit C Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit D Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit E Notice of Removal, #6 Exhibit F Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit G Notice of Removal, #8 Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit Attachment A to Civil Cover Sheet)(Mason, Jeana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hirst-Roddey v. Walmart Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maike S. Hirst-Roddey | |
| Represented By: | Shawn Alexander Owen |
| Represented By: | Michael D. Rex |
| Represented By: | Amanda Francis Owen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Jeana Marie Mason |
| Represented By: | Brandon T. Holmes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
