Armijo (PS) et al v. Graham et al
| David Armijo and April Armijo |
| Heather Graham, James Jean and Dunford |
| 1:2026cv00346 |
| January 28, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #8 Order on 4/17/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (eluce, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/17/2026. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. #7 ) is accepted and adopted. The amended Complaint (ECF No. #4 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice for the reasons stated in the Recommendation. IFP on appeal is denied. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(eluce, )
|
| Filing 7 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the amended Complaint (ECF No. #4 ) and this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for Plaintiffs failure to plead facts to show an entitlement to relief, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a), by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, ) |
|
Filing 6
Order of Reference to United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 03/27/2026. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. (All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-00346-LTB-RTG.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/26/2026. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Dunford, Heather Graham, and James Jean, filed by David Armijo, and April Armijo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Waivers and Summons)(agarc, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 30 January 2026. ORDERED that Plaintiffs file an amended Complaint on the court-approved general Complaint form which complies with the directives herein within thirty days from the date of this order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights (Non-Prisoner Complaint) against Dunford, Heather Graham, James Jean Filing Fee: $405.00Receipt Number:116838, filed by David Armijo, April Armijo. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(eguth, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
