Sheldon (PS) v. Bureau of Prisons
| Gary Sheldon |
| Bureau of Prisons |
| 1:2026cv00642 |
| February 17, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER On April 1, 2026, the Court entered an Order (ECF No. #4 ) dismissing this action without prejudice after Petitioner failed to cure a filing deficiency within 30 days, as directed in the Magistrate Judges February 19, 2026 Order (ECF No. #3 ). Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #6 ), filed on April 10, 2026, is untimely and is DENIED as moot. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/14/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(anewt,)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Cure Deficiencies by Petitioner Gary Sheldon. (echa, ) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 4/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for the failure to Petitioner, Gary Sheldon, to cure deficiencies as directed in the February 19, 2026 Order. Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to Cure Deficiencies and to Show Cause. ORDERED that Mr. Sheldon cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Mr. Sheldon fails to cure the designated deficiencies or show cause as directed within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 2/19/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agarc, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Gary Sheldon. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Envelope)(eguth, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sheldon (PS) v. Bureau of Prisons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gary Sheldon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Bureau of Prisons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
