Beidel v. Sandgaard et al
| Kent Beidel |
| Thomas Sandgaard, Anna Lucsok, Daniel Moorhead, Barry D. Michaels, Michael Cress and Joshua Disbrow |
| Levent Tuncel |
| 1:2026cv00714 |
| February 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
| 15 U.S.C. § 78 Securities Exchange Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Nicholas J. Erickson on behalf of Michael Cress, Joshua Disbrow, Barry D. MichaelsAttorney Nicholas J. Erickson added to party Michael Cress(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas J. Erickson added to party Joshua Disbrow(pty:dft), Attorney Nicholas J. Erickson added to party Barry D. Michaels(pty:dft) (Erickson, Nicholas) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by K. Austin Hartley on behalf of Anna LucsokAttorney K. Austin Hartley added to party Anna Lucsok(pty:dft) (Hartley, K.) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by William J. Leone on behalf of Anna LucsokAttorney William J. Leone added to party Anna Lucsok(pty:dft) (Leone, William) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to Consolidate Related Actions by Interested Party Levent Tuncel (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Tuncel Action, ECF No. 43, #2 Exhibit - Tuncel Action, ECF No. 49, #3 Exhibit - Tuncel Action, ECF No. 50, #4 Exhibit - Tuncel Action, ECF No. 51, #5 Exhibit - Tuncel Action, ECF No. 52)(Rajesh, Pavithra) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION (Related Cases) by Zachary A. Cunha on behalf of Thomas Sandgaard (Cunha, Zachary) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Zachary A. Cunha on behalf of Thomas SandgaardAttorney Zachary A. Cunha added to party Thomas Sandgaard(pty:dft) (Cunha, Zachary) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Robert Averill Fisher on behalf of Thomas Sandgaard (Fisher, Robert) |
Filing 21
MINUTE ORDER. This matter comes before the Court upon its own motion. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Court vacates the Scheduling Conference that is currently set on May 14, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. This Court does not reset the Scheduling Conference at this time but instead awaits ruling on the Motion to Consolidate filed at ECF 43 in Case No. 25-cv-00913-SKC-TPO. Within seven days of the ruling on the Motion to Consolidateshould consolidation be denied and this case proceed separatelythe Parties shall file a joint motion to reset the Scheduling Conference By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 3/23/2026. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 20 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Michael Cress served on 3/10/2026, answer due 3/31/2026. (Berens, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Anna Lucsok waiver sent on 3/19/2026, answer due 5/18/2026. (Berens, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 18 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Thomas Sandgaard waiver sent on 3/13/2026, answer due 5/12/2026. (Berens, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/12/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/12/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 15 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to 14 Order. Case reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews, and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara for all future proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-00714-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (agryan) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. After conferral pursuant to Local Civil Rule 3.2(d), and pursuant to Local Civil Rule 40.1(d)(4)(B) and the approval of the Chief Judge, the Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to Judge S. Kato Crews as the presiding judge and Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara as the referral judge. All future pleadings should be designated 1:26-cv-00714-SKC-TPO. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 3/11/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Related Cases by Defendant Daniel Moorhead (Lear, Coates) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Paul Howard Schwartz on behalf of Daniel MoorheadAttorney Paul Howard Schwartz added to party Daniel Moorhead(pty:dft) (Schwartz, Paul) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Coates Lear on behalf of Daniel MoorheadAttorney Coates Lear added to party Daniel Moorhead(pty:dft) (Lear, Coates) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Daniel Moorhead waiver sent on 3/5/2026, answer due 5/4/2026. (Berens, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Barry D. Michaels served on 3/4/2026, answer due 3/25/2026. (McKenna, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Kent Beidel. Joshua Disbrow served on 3/4/2026, answer due 3/25/2026. (McKenna, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jeffrey Allen Berens on behalf of Kent BeidelAttorney Jeffrey Allen Berens added to party Kent Beidel(pty:pla) (Berens, Jeffrey) |
|
Filing 6
PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 24 February 2026. (amona,)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 24 February 2026. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) shall be held on May 14, 2026, commencing at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. No later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel and pro se parties shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order in compliance with the Court's Electronic Case Filing Procedures, which are also available on the Court's website. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Proposed Scheduling Order, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (amona,)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 2/20/2026. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Cress, Joshua Disbrow, Anna Lucsok, Barry D. Michaels, Daniel Moorhead, Thomas Sandgaard (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10835834)Attorney Thomas J. McKenna added to party Kent Beidel(pty:pla), filed by Kent Beidel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Indictment, #2 Exhibit B -- Audit Committee Charter, Duties and Responsibilities, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Summons re: Sandgaard, #5 Summons re: Lucsok, #6 Summons re: Moorhead, #7 Summons re: Michaels, #8 Summons re: Cress, #9 Summons re: Disbrow)(McKenna, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
