Slack (PS) v. Flores
| Freddy Slack and Freddy L. Slack |
| Flores |
| 1:2026cv00802 |
| February 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 35 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
Filing 34
MINUTE ORDER. Mr. Slack's motions (ECF Nos. #31 - #33 ) are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows. The Clerk of the Court shall mail to Mr. Slack at his address of record a copy of the docket sheet in this case. This is the second time the Court has mailed this document to Mr. Slack. Mr. Slack's request for copies of other filings is DENIED. He may obtain copies of filings by contacting the Clerk of Court and paying the required copying fees. Entered by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/24/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
| Filing 33 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 32 Motion requesting copies of #24 , and #26 by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (pklin, ) |
| Filing 31 MOTION for Docket List by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
Filing 30
ORDER re #29 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion requesting a copy of the docket sheet (ECF No. 23) is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall mail to Petitioner at his address of record a copy of the docket sheet in this case. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. 25) is denied as moot because Petitioner was previously granted leave to proceed pursuant to 1915. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion (ECF No. 26) is denied as unintelligible. Entered by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/7/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (echa, )
|
| Filing 29 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. it is respectfully recommended that the Amended Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 (ECF No. #24 ) be denied and this action be dismissed without prejudice. Entered by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/7/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, ) |
Filing 28
ORDER OF REFERENCE to the United States Magistrate Judge, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/6/2026. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
Filing 27
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. Entered by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/4/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 26 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 25 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by Freddy Slack.(echa, ) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Request Docket List by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
Filing 22
ORDER Directing Petitioner to File Amended Application. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Petitioner must file an amended Application that complies with this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion (ECF No. #21 ) is denied as unintelligible, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
| Filing 21 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
Filing 20
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Slacks numerous filings, docketed as motions (ECF Nos. #6 - #8 , #10 - #19 ), are DENIED as unintelligible, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (anewt,) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (anewt,) |
| Filing 16 MOTION by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Copy of Case Docket Print Out by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (anewt,) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER. Mr. Slack shall submit a certificate showing the balance in his inmate account within 30 days from the date of this minute order. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice and without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/6/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Order by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (echa, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Order re Eligibility for Parole by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE re Colorado Department of Corrections Statement of Account Activity by Petitioner Freddy Slack (echa, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies. Ordered that Petitioner cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Petitioner files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Petitioner fails to cure all the designated deficiencies by the deadline this action may be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 2/26/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agarc, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Freddy Slack.(eluce, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.