Nickum v. Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC et al
| Alex Nickum |
| Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC doing business as Cardinal Group Management, Glendale Properties I, LLC doing business as Mint Urban Infinity and Glendale Properties II, LLC doing business as Mint Urban Infinity |
| 1:2026cv00812 |
| February 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Susan Prose |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER SETTING CONSENT FORM DEADLINE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 04/21/2026. The parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge Consent Form by no later than May 5, 2026. Text Only Entry (sjeff)
|
| Filing 29 BRIEF in Opposition to #25 MOTION to Remand and Attorneys' Fees filed by Defendant Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Ex. A - Affidavit of Nick Puckett, #2 Exhibit Ex. B - Deposition of A. Nickum)(Anderson, Derek) |
| Filing 28 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/31/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 27
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/31/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 26 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit of Corey May)(Wiens, Adam) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to Remand by Plaintiff Alex Nickum. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Attorney Netherland, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 to Netherland Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 to Netherland Affidavit)(Netherland, Cameron) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Steven L. Woodrow on behalf of Alex NickumAttorney Steven L. Woodrow added to party Alex Nickum(pty:pla) (Woodrow, Steven) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 Third Partially Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to File. For good cause, the Glendale Defendants are granted an extension of up to and including March 30, 2026, to file their Notice and Disclosure Certificate. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/24/2026. Text Only Entry(skcja, )
|
| Filing 22 Third MOTION for Extension of Time to File Corporate Disclosure Certificate by Defendants Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLC. (Wiens, Adam) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Cameron Netherland on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Cameron Netherland added to party Alex Nickum(pty:pla) (Netherland, Cameron) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #19 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File. For good cause, the Glendale Defendants are granted an extension of up to and including March 23, 2026, to file their Notice and Disclosure Certificate. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/16/2026. Text Only Entry(skcja, )
|
| Filing 19 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Corporate Disclosure Certificate by Defendants Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLC. (Wiens, Adam) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File. For good cause, the Glendale Defendants are granted an extension of up to and including March 16, 2026, to file their Notice and Disclosure Certificate. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/9/2026. Text Only Entry(skcja, )
|
| Filing 17 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Notice Specifying Citizenship and their Corporate Disclosure by Defendants Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLC. (Wiens, Adam) |
| Filing 16 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Anderson, Derek) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying without prejudice #14 Motion for Sanctions. Because this case has been removed to Federal Court, the parties will have to comply with not only the local rules of practice, but also this Court's practice standards and those of Magistrate Judge Prose. Judge Prose has her own procedures for handling discovery disputes and motions, and the parties will need to acquaint themselves with those procedures. Furthermore, this Court has not yet satisfied itself regarding subject matter jurisdiction and will await the Notice regarding the citizenship of the LLCs. And it is not clear whether Plaintiff will file a Motion to Remand. Should this case remain in this Court, the parties may contact Judge Prose for further discussion regarding their discovery dispute. If this matter is remanded, Plaintiff may renew his request for sanctions.SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/3/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc1)
|
| Filing 14 MOTION for Sanctions Against Cardinal (Pending in State Court) by Defendant Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC. (Anderson, Derek) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE State Court Docket (Register of Actions) by Defendant Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC (Anderson, Derek) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: In the Tenth Circuit, for this Court to obtain subject matter jurisdiction based on assertions of diversity when an LLC is a party, the citizenship of each member of the LLC must be considered, rather than the LLCs principal place of business. Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Sur. Co., 781 F.3d 1233, 1234 (10th Cir. 2015) ("This case requires that we decide how to determine the citizenship, for purposes of diversity jurisdiction, of a limited liability company ("LLC")). Like every other circuit to consider this question, this court concludes an LLC, as an unincorporated association, takes the citizenship of all its members."). Here, Defendant's jurisdiction statement does not include any information regarding the members of these Defendant LLCs. More specificity is required. Because the Court is duty-bound to police its own jurisdiction, it must be satisfied that diversity, as relevant to the Class Action Fairness Act, exists. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant shall file a Notice on or before March 9, 2026, specifying the citizenship of each LLC member for each party. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 3/2/2026. Text Only Entry (skclc1)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Bolor Nyamaa on behalf of Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLCAttorney Bolor Nyamaa added to party Glendale Properties I, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Bolor Nyamaa added to party Glendale Properties II, LLC(pty:dft) (Nyamaa, Bolor) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Adam B. Wiens on behalf of Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLCAttorney Adam B. Wiens added to party Glendale Properties I, LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Adam B. Wiens added to party Glendale Properties II, LLC(pty:dft) (Wiens, Adam) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jennifer Rende O'Shea on behalf of Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLCAttorney Jennifer Rende O'Shea added to party Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC(pty:dft) (O'Shea, Jennifer) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Derek C. Anderson on behalf of Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC (Anderson, Derek) |
| Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (echa, ) |
| Filing 6 Exhibits in Support Civil Cover Sheet by Defendant Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC. (Anderson, Derek) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 4 Class Action COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC, Glendale Properties I, LLC, Glendale Properties II, LLC, filed by Alex Nickum.(echa, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC d/b/a Cardinal Group Management from District Court, Denver County, Colorado, Case Number 2024cv31109. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10851022), filed by Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Anderson, Derek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nickum v. Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alex Nickum | |
| Represented By: | Steven L. Woodrow |
| Represented By: | Cameron Netherland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cardinal Group Management & Advisory, LLC doing business as Cardinal Group Management | |
| Represented By: | Derek C. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Jennifer Rende O'Shea |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Glendale Properties I, LLC doing business as Mint Urban Infinity | |
| Represented By: | Bolor Nyamaa |
| Represented By: | Adam B. Wiens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Glendale Properties II, LLC doing business as Mint Urban Infinity | |
| Represented By: | Bolor Nyamaa |
| Represented By: | Adam B. Wiens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
