C T Corporation System v. CT Corporation system
| C T Corporation System |
| CT Corporation system |
| 1:2026cv00992 |
| March 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Trademark |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER. This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Continue the Scheduling Conference [#12]. Defendant has not entered an appearance in this matter or otherwise responded to Plaintiff's complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#12] is GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for July 10, 2026, at 11:30 a.m. is VACATED. The Court will reset the scheduling conference at a later date, as necessary and appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for the parties to file their proposed scheduling order is vacated until further notice. Entered by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 6/2/2026. Text Only Entry (kaslc9, )
|
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #12 MOTION to Continue the Scheduling Conference filed by C T Corporation System. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 06/01/2026. Text Only Entry (cnslc2, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Continue the Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff C T Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Granting Plaintiff C T Corporation System's Motion to Reschedule the Scheduling Conference)(Smith, J.) |
Filing 11
MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Motion for Reconsideration re 9 Clerk's Note Regarding Default,or in the Alternative Moves for an Order Compelling the Clerk to Enter a Default. Motion #10 is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/20/2026. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9 Clerk's Note Regarding Default,, or in the Alternative Moves for an Order Compelling the Clerk to Enter a Default by Plaintiff C T Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Supplemental Affidavit of J. Mark Smith in Support of Plaintiff C T Corporation System's Motion for Entry of Default by the Clerk of the Court Against Defendant CT Corporation system, #2 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Re Plaintiff C T Corporation System's Motion for Reconsideration of the Clerk's Position Note on Entry of Default Against the Defendant or in the Alternative Moves for an Order Compelling the Clerk to Enter a Default)(Smith, J.) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTE REGARDING DEFAULT. Default will not be entered as to CT Corporation system re #8 MOTION for Order to Entry of Default by the Clerk of the Court Against Defendant, CT Corporation system as: the affidavit or declaration required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) does not include the date service was complete, the affidavit or declaration required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) does not include a statement that no responsive pleading has been filed within the time limit set by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the court, no proof of service has been filed, by Clerk. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Order to Entry of Default by the Clerk of the Court Against Defendant, CT Corporation system by Plaintiff C T Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of J. Mark Smith in Support of Plaintiff C T Corporation System's Motion for Entry of Default by the Clerk of the Court Against Defendant CT Corporation system, #2 Exhibit A - Doc. 1 - Complaint and Jury Demand, #3 Exhibit B - Doc. 4 - Summons in a Civil Action - issued, #4 Exhibit C - Colorado Secretary of State - Organization Record Confirmation, #5 Exhibit D - Affidavit of Nonservice, #6 Exhibit E - Cover Letter to CT Corporation system serving Summons and Complaint dated 04/09/2026, #7 Exhibit F - Tracking Information for Certified Mail updated 04/13/2026, #8 Exhibit G - Return of Certified Mail, #9 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Re Plaintiff C T Corporation System's Motion and Application to the Clerk for Entry of Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a))(Smith, J.) |
Filing 7
PRE-SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 13 March 2026. (amona,)
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 13 March 2026. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) shall be held on June 10, 2026, commencing at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. No later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the Scheduling/Planning Conference, counsel and pro se parties shall submit their proposed Scheduling Order in compliance with the Court's Electronic Case Filing Procedures, which are also available on the Court's website. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Proposed Scheduling Order, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (amona,)
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 3/12/26. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (echa, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Smith, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CT Corporation system (a Colorado corporation) (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10873932)Attorney J. Mark Smith added to party C T Corporation System(pty:pla), filed by C T Corporation System. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Reg. Cert. 972047, #2 Exhibit 2 - CT Corporation Delaware Information, #3 Exhibit 3 - Colorado Secretary of State - Summary, #4 Exhibit 4 - Articles of Incorporation, #5 Exhibit 5 - Tricked companies, #6 Exhibit 6 - 2025.10.02 Letter to Payton Re CT infringement, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons)(Smith, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: C T Corporation System v. CT Corporation system | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: C T Corporation System | |
| Represented By: | J. Mark Smith |
| Represented By: | Alexander Colin Wexler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: CT Corporation system | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.