Mullally v. Hardman et al
| Christopher Andrew Mullally |
| John R. Hardman, Ashlee E. Dunham and Danborn, Thiessen & Dunham P.C. |
| 1:2026cv01071 |
| March 16, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 3604 (f)(3)(c) - Fair Housing Amendments Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM regarding #22 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Danborn, Thiessen & Dunham P.C., Ashlee E. Dunham. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/12/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendants Danborn, Thiessen & Dunham P.C., Ashlee E. Dunham. (Cooper, Jason) |
| Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #18 Summons Returned Executed Addressed to Christopher Andrew Mullally. (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 20 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #16 Certificate of Service Addressed to Christopher Andrew Mullally. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 19 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #15 Notice (Other) Addressed to Christopher Andrew Mullally. (agryan) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed Danborn, Thiessen & Dunham P.C. served on 4/20/2026, answer due 5/11/2026; Ashlee E. Dunham served on 4/20/2026, answer due 5/11/2026. (Attachments: #1 Process return receipt)(jrobe, ) |
| Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #14 Order, Addressed to Christopher Andrew Mullally. (echa, ) |
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Verified Complaint and Jury Demand for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Marshal Service Form, #2 U.S. Marshal Service Form, #3 U.S. Marshal Service Form) (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Compliance with Court Order by Plaintiff Christopher Andrew Mullally. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/6/2026. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/2/2026. Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2026 11:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 13 ADVISEMENT TO PRO SE LITIGANTS OF AVAILABLE RESOURCES: Since at least one party is not represented by counsel the Court would like to apprise any and all pro se parties of a couple of resources available to people representing themselves in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The first is the Federal Pro Se Clinic which provides free legal assistance to people representing themselves in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The Clinic helps to prepare responsive pleadings, assist with other common pleadings, answers procedural questions, and explains legal concepts such as jurisdiction, venue, and service of process. Pro se parties may contact the Clinic by phone (303-824-5395) or online at www.cobar.org/cofederalproseclinic.The second is the Federal Limited Appearance Program (FLAP). FLAP aims to address the difficulty pro se parties in civil litigation sometimes face when appearing in court for certain non-dispositive hearings or conferences--such as scheduling conferences, status conferences, discovery hearings, and settlement conferences--by providing those litigants with a volunteer attorney who appears with them in court. Information about FLAP may be found online at www.cobar.org/For-Members/Young-Lawyers-Division/YLD-Application. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER On or before April 30, 2026, Plaintiff shall provide the Court with the addresses of John R. Hardman and Ashlee E. Dunham. While the Court will cover service of process via the US Marshal, it is not the Court's responsibility to locate the appropriate addresses for Defendants. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. After initial review under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be assigned to District Judge S. Kato Crews and Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c) and 40.1(d)(1); see also Mullally v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., Case No. 25-cv-01729-SKC-STV (pending). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case be ASSIGNED to District Judge s. Kato Crews and Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(d)(1). (Case directly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all further proceedings. All future pleadings shall be designated to 26-cv-01071-SKC). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #6 ) is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that the unsigned Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 4 ) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/31/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Christopher Andrew Mullally. (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiency designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/17/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 4 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Christopher Andrew Mullally. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Plaintiff Christopher Andrew Mullally. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 Verified COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Danborn, Thiessen & Dunham P.C., Ashlee E. Dunham, and John R. Hardman, filed by Christopher Andrew Mullally. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons)(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
