Kasper v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Annette Kasper
Defendant: Target Corporation and Target Store
Case Number: 1:2026cv01095
Filed: March 17, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Referring Judge: Timothy P O'Hara
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 9, 2026 Filing 19 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held on 7/9/2026 before Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. FTR: C402. (jtorr, )
July 9, 2026 Filing 18 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Torrey Livenick on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Torrey Livenick added to party Annette Kasper(pty:pla) (Livenick, Torrey)
July 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 07/07/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
July 6, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent form [ECF #14 ] filed by the Defendant expressing non-consent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(8), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) to a District Judge. This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1(c). (Case randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara for all further proceedings. All future pleadings shall be designated to 26-cv- 01095-GPG). By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 7/6/2026. (ggill, )
July 6, 2026 Filing 15 STATEMENT DEFENANTS RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE by Defendant Target Corporation. (Bell, Lori)
July 6, 2026 Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Target Corporation All parties do not consent.. (Bell, Lori)
July 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara on 7/2/2026. This matter comes before the Court upon its review of the docket. In its minute order setting the scheduling conference, the deadline for the Parties to complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form #11 was set for June 25, 2026. This deadline has now lapsed, and the Parties have failed to timely submit the form. Additionally, the Court ordered the Parties to file their Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 disclosures by the deadline for submitting the Proposed Scheduling Order. Although Defendant submitted a disclosure form certifying it has no parent company and no publicly held corporation owns more than 10% of its stock, #3 , this does not satisfy the citizenship disclosure requirements of Rule 7.1(a)(2), addressed in #11 . Plaintiff has neither filed any disclosure, nor has Plaintiff yet appeared in this matter since it was removed. The Court sua sponte extends the time for the Parties to address these deficiencies. By July 6, 2026, (1) the Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form #9 ; (2) Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Entry of Appearance in this matter; and (3) each Party shall file their respective 7.1(a)(2) citizenship disclosures. If these filings are not timely submitted, the Court will sua sponte continue the Scheduling Conference set for July 9, 2026, as these obligations must be met before the Scheduling Conference. Finally, Chambers has not received a Word copy of the Proposed Scheduling Order in compliance with #11 . The Parties are instructed to promptly email the Word version of their Proposed Scheduling Order #12 to O'[email protected]. Counsel for Defendant shall be responsible for providing this Order to Plaintiff/Plaintiff's counsel. Text Only Entry (tpolc2, )
July 2, 2026 Filing 12 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Target Corporation. (Bell, Lori)
May 22, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER. The above captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge O'Hara pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form [ECF #9 ] on or before June 25, 2026. The Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on July 9, 2026, at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom C-402, on the fourth floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. This will be an in-person proceeding. No later than seven days before the Scheduling Conference, the Parties shall (1) file their Proposed Scheduling Order onto the case docket sheet and (2) jointly email a Word Copy of the proposed Scheduling Order, copying all Parties, to Chambers at #o'[email protected]. By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 5/22/2026. (ggill, )
March 24, 2026 Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation.(Vogel, Sarah)
March 18, 2026 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (dhern, )
March 17, 2026 Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara. Text Only Entry. (dhern, )
March 17, 2026 Filing 7 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Target Corporation, filed by Annette Kasper.(dhern, ) Modified to match file date on 3/18/2026 (dhern, ).
March 17, 2026 Filing 6 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (dhern, )
March 17, 2026 Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (dhern, )
March 17, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Sarah Vogel on behalf of Target Corporation a/k/a Target Store 1976Attorney Sarah Vogel added to party Target Corporation a/k/a Target Store 1976(pty:dft) (Vogel, Sarah)
March 17, 2026 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Bell, Lori)
March 17, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Target Corporation a/k/a Target Store 1976 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Docket)(Bell, Lori)
March 17, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation a/k/a Target Store 1976 from Annette Kasper v. Target Corporation, Case Number 2026CV30538. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10886978), filed by Target Corporation a/k/a Target Store 1976. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 2026.02.23 District Court Complaint & JD, #2 Exhibit B - 2026.02.23 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - 2026.02.23 Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Colorado Secretary of State Corporate Summary, #5 Exhibit E - Service S&C, #6 Exhibit F - 2026.02.23 Delay Reduction Order, #7 Exhibit G - 2026.02.23 Div 204 DRO & Order re Plan For Settlement, #8 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bell, Lori)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kasper v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Lori Kathryn Bell
Represented By: Sarah Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Store
Represented By: Lori Kathryn Bell
Represented By: Sarah Vogel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette Kasper
Represented By: Torrey Livenick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?