Martin v. Kodger
| John Elwood Tyrone Martin |
| Kodger |
| 1:2026cv01273 |
| March 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #9 Order Reassigning Case,,,, Order to Show Cause,,,, Set/Clear Flags,,, by Respondent Kodger. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1 - Progress Report)(Wertheim, Elliot) |
Filing 15
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and #13 and #14 Elections Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, who will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 05/08/2026. Text Only Entry. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agryan)
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondent Kodger All parties consent.. (Wertheim, Elliot) |
| Filing 13 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner John Elwood Tyrone Martin. Only Plaintiff consents. (Attachments: #1 Consent instructions)(ccuen, ) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 4/21/2026. This case has been directly assigned to a magistrate judge. D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c). Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4), IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form (ECF No. #10 ), indicating either the unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined, on or before 30 days of the date of this minute order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 12 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN as to United States Attorney General on 4/20/2026. (echa, ) |
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (anewt,) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND DRAWING CASE. ORDERED that Respondent show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of Respondent's answer to this show cause order Applicant may file a reply. ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/20/2026. (Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01273-SBP). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
|
| Filing 8 Preliminary RESPONSE to #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Kodger. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex 1: Admin Grievances)(Wertheim, Elliot) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Elliot Wertheim on behalf of KodgerAttorney Elliot Wertheim added to party Kodger(pty:res) (Wertheim, Elliot) |
| Filing 6 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Receipt of Documents by the United States Attorney's Office re #5 Certificate of Service (eluce, ) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Order, (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (eluce, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO FILE PRELIMINARY RESPONSE. Within twenty-one days from the date of this Order Respondent shall file a Preliminary Response that complies with this Order, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 3/27/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (eluce, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 2 PETITIONERS MOTION For Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 With Respect to the application of FTC days by Petitioner John Elwood Tyrone Martin. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $5, Receipt Number 117488), filed by John Elwood Tyrone Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope, #3 Receipt, #4 Cover Letter)(dhern, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Kodger | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Elwood Tyrone Martin | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Kodger | |
| Represented By: | Elliot Wertheim |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
