Gonzalez v. City of Boulder, Colorado et al
| Laura Gonzalez |
| City of Boulder, Colorado, Carlos Castro, Carlos (I) Castro, Brandon Mulhall, Brandon (I) Mulhall, Jesus Bustillos, Jesus (I) Bustillos, Anne Johnson, Anne (I) Johnson, Caitlin Spinney, Caitlin (I) Spinney, Michelle Lopez, Michelle (I) Lopez, Elijah Cook-Cruz and Elijah (I) Cook-Cruz |
| 1:2026cv01342 |
| March 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Susan Prose |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David M. Goddard on behalf of Jesus Bustillos, Jesus (I) Bustillos, Carlos Castro, Carlos (I) Castro, Elijah Cook-Cruz, Elijah (I) Cook-Cruz, Anne Johnson, Anne (I) Johnson, Michelle Lopez, Michelle (I) Lopez, Brandon Mulhall, Brandon (I) Mulhall, Caitlin Spinney, Caitlin (I) SpinneyAttorney David M. Goddard added to party Jesus Bustillos(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Jesus (I) Bustillos(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Carlos Castro(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Carlos (I) Castro(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Elijah Cook-Cruz(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Elijah (I) Cook-Cruz(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Anne Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Anne (I) Johnson(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Michelle Lopez(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Michelle (I) Lopez(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Brandon Mulhall(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Brandon (I) Mulhall(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Caitlin Spinney(pty:dft), Attorney David M. Goddard added to party Caitlin (I) Spinney(pty:dft) (Goddard, David) |
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Michelle Lopez waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Jesus Bustillos waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Elijah Cook-Cruz waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Carlos Castro waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Caitlin Spinney waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Brandon Mulhall waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. Anne Johnson waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 6/22/2026. (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. City of Boulder, Colorado served on 4/20/2026, answer due 5/11/2026., WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Laura Gonzalez. City of Boulder, Colorado waiver sent on 4/20/2026, answer due 5/11/2026. (McNulty, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mari Anne Newman on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Mari Anne Newman added to party Laura Gonzalez(pty:pla) (Newman, Mari) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Madeline Marie Leibin on behalf of Laura GonzalezAttorney Madeline Marie Leibin added to party Laura Gonzalez(pty:pla) (Leibin, Madeline) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/2/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10914546)Attorney Andrew Joseph McNulty added to party Laura Gonzalez(pty:pla), filed by Laura Gonzalez.(McNulty, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
