Brooks v. Nissan North America, Inc.
| Jason T Brooks and Jason Brooks |
| Nissan North America, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv01385 |
| April 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Nissan North America, Inc. by Plaintiff Jason T Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q)(Brooks, Jason) |
| Filing 15 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Nissan North America, Inc. re #14 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Nissan North America, Inc., by Clerk. Text Only Entry (ggill, ) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Nissan North America, Inc. by Plaintiff Jason T Brooks. (Brooks, Jason) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed Nissan North America, Inc. served on 4/10/2026, answer due 5/1/2026. (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE re #11 Certificate of Service by Plaintiff Jason T Brooks (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Brooks, Jason) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Verified Complaint for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 U.S. Marshal Service Form) (jrobe, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/6/2026. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/2/2026. Scheduling Conference set for 6/9/2026 10:15 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF PRO SE E-FILING PRIVILEGES: Plaintiff, Jason T Brooks, sought and received e-filing privileges on 4/6/2026. All further service will be effectuated electronically via CM/ECF to the email address of record.(Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/3/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/3/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER ASSIGNING CASE. After initial review under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, this case will be assigned to District Judge S. Kato Crews and Chief Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c) and 40.1(d)(1); Brooks v. Colo. Dept of Corr., No. 25-cv-02610-SKC-STV (pending). Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be assigned to District Judge S. Kato Crews and Chief Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(d)(1). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 04/02/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ordered that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. The United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining defendant(s) for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c), by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 04/01/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(agryan) Modified on 4/2/2026 to correct date (agryan).
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Jason T Brooks. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 VERIFIED COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Nissan North America, Inc., filed by Jason Brooks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
