Wells v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., et al
| Patricia Wells |
| Pavestone, LLC and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. doing business as Home Depot Colorado Springs #1504, The |
| 1:2026cv01398 |
| April 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| S Kato Crews |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 Defendant Home Depot USA Inc.'s ANSWER to #19 Amended Complaint by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc..(Mereness, John) |
| Filing 22 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Mereness, John) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John David Mereness on behalf of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Quikrete Companies, LLC, TheAttorney John David Mereness added to party Quikrete Companies, LLC, The(pty:dft) (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form Notice of Non-Consent - all parties do not consent)(Mereness, John) |
| Filing 20 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Home Depot, Inc. for Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Mereness, John) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Pavestone, LLC, filed by Patricia Wells.(LaCrue, DezaRae) |
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER granting #15 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Complaint to Substitute a Defendant. Plaintiff is directed to file an unmarked copy of the First Amended Complaint no later than May 19, 2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 5/12/2026. Text Only Entry(mdblc6.)
|
| Filing 17 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #4 Complaint to Substitute a Defendant filed by Patricia Wells. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/8/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading re #4 Complaint, #15 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #4 Complaint to Substitute a Defendant by Plaintiff Patricia Wells (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document First Amended Complaint - Marked)(LaCrue, DezaRae) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #4 Complaint to Substitute a Defendant by Plaintiff Patricia Wells. (LaCrue, DezaRae) |
| Filing 14 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Retter, Samuel) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #4 Complaint Attorney Robert James Zavaglia, Jr added to party Quikrete Companies, LLC, The(pty:dft) by Quikrete Companies, LLC, The.(Zavaglia, Robert) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/27/2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 4/9/2026. (evaug)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/6/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 4/6/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (dhern, ) |
| Filing 8 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #4 Complaint Defendant's Answer and Jury Demand to Plaintiff's Complaint by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc..(dhern, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Summons, District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim or Third Party Complaint, Complaint upon Jim Doherty on 3/5/2026. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service of District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet, Complaint, Summons upon Shannon White on 3/4/2026. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., The Quikrete Companies, LLC, filed by Patricia Wells.(dhern, ) |
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (dhern, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by DezaRae D. LaCrue on behalf of Patricia WellsAttorney DezaRae D. LaCrue added to party Patricia Wells(pty:pla) (LaCrue, DezaRae) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., d/b/a The Home Depot Colorado Springs #1504 from District Court of El Paso County, Colorado, Case Number 2026CV30536. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10922504), filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., d/b/a The Home Depot Colorado Springs #1504. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B-1 State Court Register of Actions, #3 Exhibit B-2 State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit B-3 State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit B-4 State Court Civil Summons, #6 Exhibit B-5 State Court Affidavit of Service_Home Depot, #7 Exhibit B-6 State Court Affidavit of Service_Quikrete, #8 Exhibit B-7 State Court Defs Answer and JD, #9 Exhibit C, #10 Exhibit D, #11 Exhibit E, #12 Exhibit F, #13 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alvarado, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
