Ramirez Salvador v. Mullin et al
| Alvaro Ramirez Salvador |
| Markwayne Mullin, Todd Lyons, George Valdez and Juan Baltazar |
| 1:2026cv01471 |
| April 7, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Puskar, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #10 Order on 4/29/2026. (schap, ) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/29/2026, re: #1 the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241 is GRANTED. Respondents shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a) within SEVEN DAYS of the date of this Court's Order. Respondents shall file a status report within TEN DAYS of the date of this Court's order to certify compliance. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 9 REPLY to #6 Answer to Complaint by Petitioner Alvaro Ramirez Salvador. (Bell, Jonathon) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and #7 Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, who will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 4/20/2026. Text Only Entry (dddlc1, )
|
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Alvaro Ramirez Salvador All parties consent.. (Bell, Jonathon) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Juan Baltazar, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh. A)(Puskar, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Elizabeth Erin Puskar on behalf of Juan Baltazar, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, George ValdezAttorney Elizabeth Erin Puskar added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Elizabeth Erin Puskar added to party Todd Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Elizabeth Erin Puskar added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Elizabeth Erin Puskar added to party George Valdez(pty:res) (Puskar, Elizabeth) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/9/2026. ORDERED that Respondents show cause within seven (7) days from the date of this Order why the Application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. ORDERED that, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.2(d), the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form, available from the Courts website at www.cod.uscourts.gov, on or before April 15, 2026. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10931513)Attorney Jonathon Gregory Bell added to party Alvaro Ramirez Salvador(pty:pet), filed by Alvaro Ramirez Salvador. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1 NTA)(Bell, Jonathon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
