Elsheikh v. Defense Intelligence Agency
Plaintiff: Elshafee Elsheikh
Defendant: Defense Intelligence Agency
Case Number: 1:2026cv01503
Filed: April 6, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Susan Prose
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's #23 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 06/04/2026. Defense Intelligence Agency shall file its responsive pleading on or before July 16, 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
June 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 06/04/2026. Regarding Plaintiff's #11 Motion to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel, #12 Motion to Request this Court to Relief Him from Sending Hard Copies of Each and Every Pleading, and all related briefing.Upon review of the Motion and the docket in this case, this court cannot conclude that appointment of counsel is warranted at this time. The court does not find that the legal issues presented in Plaintiff's claims are so uniquely complex as to justify appointed counsel. "[T]he right to counsel in a civil case is not a matter of constitutional right under the Sixth Amendment." MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988). Further, it is too early for this court to assess the merit of Plaintiff's claims, which is one of the factors that the court is to consider under the local rule establishing the pro bono program, D.C.COLO.LAttyR 15. Thus, Plaintiff's #11 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice to refiling after Plaintiff's case moves forward. For the reasons articulated in Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's motion regarding service of pleadings (ECF No. #12 ), the relief requested is GRANTED. Defendant will receive electronic service of any document submitted by Plaintiff upon entry of same by the Clerk's Office.Objections to this order are due within fourteen days. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
May 27, 2026 Filing 23 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency. (Isler, Thomas)
May 26, 2026 Filing 22 RESPONSE to #12 MOTION for Order to Relieve Him of Sending Hard Copies of Each Pleading to Defense Intelligence Agency filed by Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency. (Isler, Thomas)
May 26, 2026 Filing 21 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel filed by Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency. (Isler, Thomas)
May 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER OF REFERENCE by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/21/2026. Pursuant to #19 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge, this case is referred for disposition to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01503-SBP. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
May 21, 2026 Filing 19 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency All parties consent.. (Isler, Thomas)
May 20, 2026 Filing 18 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Elshafee Elsheikh. Plaintiff consents. (echa, )
May 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER GRANTING Defendant's #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 05/09/2026. Defendant shall file its responsive pleading on or before June 1, 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
May 7, 2026 Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint filed by Defense Intelligence Agency. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/07/2026. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendant Defense Intelligence Agency. (Isler, Thomas)
May 6, 2026 Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Thomas Alan Isler on behalf of Defense Intelligence AgencyAttorney Thomas Alan Isler added to party Defense Intelligence Agency(pty:dft) (Isler, Thomas)
May 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #12 MOTION for Order to filed by Elshafee Elsheikh, #11 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel filed by Elshafee Elsheikh. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/05/2026. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
May 4, 2026 Filing 12 MOTION to Request this Court to Relieve Him from Sending Hard Copies of Each and Every Pleading to Defense Intelligence Agency by Plaintiff Elshafee Elsheikh. (sphil, )
May 4, 2026 Filing 11 Prisoner MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel by Plaintiff Elshafee Elsheikh. (sphil, )
April 20, 2026 Filing 10 RETURN Certified Mail Receipt of Service upon the United States Attorney General re: #8 Certificate of Service. (sphil, )
April 10, 2026 Filing 9 RETURN ACKNOWLEDGMENT of Service upon Defense Intelligence Agency, re: #8 CERTIFICATE of Service on 4/10/2026. (sphil, )
April 10, 2026 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service, by Clerk of Court re #1 Prisoner Complaint for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS Certified Mail Receipt) (sphil, )
April 10, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order, and (5) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/10/2026. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
April 9, 2026 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (anewt, )
April 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER DRAWING CASE. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be DRAWN to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/9/2026. (Case randomly reassigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Susan B. Prose for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01503-PAB). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
April 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #3 ) is granted. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/9/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. [Copy sent as ordered]. (anewt, )
April 6, 2026 Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Elshafee Elsheikh. (agarc, )
April 6, 2026 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (agarc, )
April 6, 2026 Filing 1 Prisoner COMPLAINT against Defense Intelligence Agency, filed by Elshafee Elsheikh. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agarc, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Elsheikh v. Defense Intelligence Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elshafee Elsheikh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Defense Intelligence Agency
Represented By: Thomas Alan Isler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?