Custard (PS) v. Denver County DHS-CSS Unit
| David D. Custard |
| Denver County DHS-CSS Unit |
| 1:2026cv01550 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Denver County DHS-CSS Unit, filed by David D. Custard. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit)(echa, ) |
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 05/11/2026. Mr. Custard is advised that he has not cured all filing deficiencies in this action because he has not submitted a pleading on a court-approved form. The Court will allow Mr. Custard thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to submit his claims on the proper form. Mr. Custard is warned that if he fails to comply within thirty days of the date of this Minute Order, the Court will dismiss this action without further notice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Writ of Habeas Corpus for Restraint of Liberty to Pursue Livelihood by Suspension of Drivers License Without Due Process of Law Under the 14th Amendment, by Petitioner David D. Custard (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2)(sphil, ) |
| Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs by Petitioner David D. Custard. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff/Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Writ of Habeas Corpus for Restraint of Liberty to Pursue Livelihood by Suspension of Drivers License Without Due Process of Law Under the 14t Amendment, filed by David D. Custard. (Attachments: #1 Non-Discretionary Ministerial Duty of Clerk's Office to Accept Evidence with Pleadings and File on Demand Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 Notice to Court Federal Rules of Evidence 201(d) or State Court Equivalent Requiring Court to Take Judicial Notice of Memorandum of Laws as Adjudicated Facts in Support of Wri of Habeas Corpus)(dhern, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Custard (PS) v. Denver County DHS-CSS Unit | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David D. Custard | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Denver County DHS-CSS Unit | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
