Ortiz (PS) v. MC et al
| Albert J. Ortiz |
| MC, Elias Diggins and Al Gardner |
| 1:2026cv01552 |
| April 10, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT against Elias Diggins, Al Gardner, MC, filed by Albert J. Ortiz.(anewt,) |
Filing 9
Order to File Amended Prisoner Complaint by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 05/11/2026. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days from the date of this Order, an amended Prisoner Complaint, on the court-approved Prisoner Complaint form, that complies with the directives in this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended Prisoner Complaint within the time allowed, this action may be dismissed without further notice. The Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ) is denied without prejudice as premature while this case is in initial review. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
Filing 8
Order Granting Leave To Proceed Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 05/11/2026. ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #7 ) is granted. The United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining defendant(s) for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). The Clerk of Court send a copy of this order to the Business Office, Attn: Inmate Accounts, Denver Sheriff Department, Denver, Colorado. The Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is denied. (Copy of Order mailed as ordered.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(pklin, )
|
| Filing 7 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Albert J. Ortiz. (anewt,) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Elias Diggins, Al Gardner, MC, filed by Albert J. Ortiz.(anewt,) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order if he wishes to pursue claims in this action. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Albert J. Ortiz. (agryan) |
| Filing 2 Declaration in Support of Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Plaintiff Albert J. Ortiz. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Violation of Civil Rights (Prisoner Complaint) against Dentist DSHS, Denver Sheriff Dept Denver Health, Denver Sheriff Dept., Elias Diggins, Al Gardner, MC, filed by Albert J. Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Envelope)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.