Forrest v. MidValley Family Practice, P.C.
| Megan Forrest |
| MidValley Family Practice, P.C. |
| 1:2026cv01562 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 Civil Case Terminated as duplicate. Please see 26-cv-1563. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Forrest v. MidValley Family Practice, P.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Megan Forrest | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: MidValley Family Practice, P.C. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.