DeNicola v. Town of Sugar City et al
| John DeNicola |
| Town of Sugar City and Cindy Karle |
| 1:2026cv01569 |
| April 13, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 31 SURREPLY re #22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery filed by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DeNicola, John) |
| Filing 30 REPLY to Response to #22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery filed by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Goldfarb, David) |
| Filing 29 RESPONSE by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(DeNicola, John) |
| Filing 28 LETTER re: #22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (DeNicola, John) |
| Filing 27 RESPONSE to #22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery filed by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (DeNicola, John) |
Filing 26
MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate and Reset the May 12, 2026 Scheduling Conference (ECF No. #18 ) is DENIED as moot. It is further ORDERED that a Motion Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #21 ) and Motion to Stay Discovery (ECF No. #22 ) is set for June 25, 2026 at 11:00 a.m. MT. The hearing will be conducted via telephone. Five minutes prior to the start of the hearing, the parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (571) 353-2301, Access Code 841686937#. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. By Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 05/14/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 25
MEMORANDUM regarding #16 MOTION for Protective Order; #18 MOTION to Vacate and Re-Set the May 12, 2026 Scheduling Conference; #21 MOTION to Dismiss; and #22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery. Motions #16 , #18 , #21 , and #22 are referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/14/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 24 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to 23 Minute Order. Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01569-CNS-NRN. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 23
MINUTE ORDER: The undersigned hereby voluntarily recuses herself from the above-captioned matter. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case to another magistrate judge in this district in accordance with the court's assignment procedures. All dates set by this Court are hereby vacated, to be reset in the discretion of the newly assigned magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 5/11/2026. Text Only Entry (mdblc6.)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION to Stay re #20 Response to Motion to Stay Discovery by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Goldfarb, David) |
| Filing 21 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Goldfarb, David) |
| Filing 20 RESPONSE to #18 MOTION to Vacate and Re-Set the May 12, 2026 Scheduling Conference filed by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (DeNicola, John) |
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM regarding #18 Motion to Vacate and Re-Set the May 12, 2026 Scheduling Conference. Motion #18 is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Vacate and Re-Set the May 12, 2026 Scheduling Conference by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Anderson, Sonia) |
|
Filing 17
MEMORANDUM regarding #16 Motion for Protective Order. Motion #16 is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 4/27/2026. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Protective Order by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Emails, #2 certificate of service)(DeNicola, John) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER SETTING PRELIMINARY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE. Video Scheduling Conference set for 5/12/2026 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell (instructions attached). By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 4/22/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (Attachments: #1 VTC Instructions) (evaug)
|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond, Response by Plaintiff John DeNicola. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(DeNicola, John) |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER granting Defendants' #3 Opposed Motion for Extension of Time. Though the Court notes Plaintiff's opposition, it finds the extension request to be reasonable. Defendants' deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to May 11, 2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 4/17/2026. Text Only Entry(mdblc1)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF PRO SE E-FILING PRIVILEGES: Plaintiff, John DeNicola, sought and received e-filing privileges on 4/16/2026. All further service will be effectuated electronically via CM/ECF to the email address of record.(Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. The Opposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond, ECF No. #3 , is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 4/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (pklin, ) |
|
Filing 9
Order Drawing Case by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 04/15/2026. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. (This case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01569-CNS.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond Opposed Motion for Extension of Time by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Anderson, Sonia) |
| Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Petition/Complaint, Summons, Case Cover Sheet, EXB A Flash drive, EXB B Emails upon Vicky Baver on 3/25/2026. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City, filed by John DeNicola.(dhern, ) |
| Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE to filer of non-compliance with Notice of Removal case opening procedures. Pursuant to Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1, and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a, each of the state court documents shall be individual PDFs. See Appendix B Notice of Removal in the User Guide - Attorney Case Opening Procedures document. (Text Only Entry.) (dhern, ) |
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (dhern, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1(B) by Defendants Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Goldfarb, David) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City Notice of Removal of Action Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) from Crowley County District Court, Case Number 2026CV5. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10945584), filed by Cindy Karle, Town of Sugar City. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Goldfarb, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
