Villalobos-Perez v. Mullin et al
| Argenis Jesus Villalobos-Perez |
| Markwayne Mullin, Todd Lyons, Gregory Davies, Johnny Choate, Todd Blanche, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Executive Office for Immigration Review, The |
| 1:2026cv01590 |
| April 14, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Philip A Brimmer |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT re: #10 Order, by Clerk on 5/13/26. (sgrim) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/12/2026 re: #11 Joint Status Report. On April 29, 2026, the Court granted petitioner's habeas petition and ordered respondents to provide petitioner with a bond hearing within seven days of the date of the Court's order. Docket No. #10 at 5. On May 11, 2026, the parties filed a status report informing the Court that petitioner was granted release on bond and has been released from custody. Docket No. #11 at 1. Accordingly, the Court will close the case. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 11 Joint STATUS REPORT by Respondents Todd Blanche, Johnny Choate, Gregory Davies, Executive Office for Immigration Review, The, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Soler, Andrew) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 4/29/2026, re: #1 Petitioner Argenis Jesus Villalobos-Perez's Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. ORDERED that, within seven days of the date of this Court's order, respondents shall provide petitioner with a bond hearing under 8 U.S.C. 1226(a), where the government shall bear the burden of proving that petitioner's continued detention is justified. ORDERED that, within five days of petitioner's bond hearing, the parties shall file a status report indicating whether the bond hearing was held and whether bond was granted or denied. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 9 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #7 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Philip A. Brimmer. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01590-PAB. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE to #5 Order to Show Cause,,, by Respondents Todd Blanche, Johnny Choate, Gregory Davies, Executive Office for Immigration Review, The, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Soler, Andrew) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Todd Blanche, Johnny Choate, Gregory Davies, Executive Office for Immigration Review, The, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement All parties do not consent.. (Soler, Andrew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Andrew M. Soler on behalf of Todd Blanche, Johnny Choate, Gregory Davies, Executive Office for Immigration Review, The, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, United States Immigration and Customs EnforcementAttorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Johnny Choate(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Gregory Davies(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Executive Office for Immigration Review, The(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Todd Lyons(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Andrew M. Soler added to party United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement(pty:res) (Soler, Andrew) |
|
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 04/15/2026. Having reviewed the Petition, the Court ORDERS Petitioner to, no later than April 17, 2026, (1) serve Respondents with a copy of the Petition and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, by e-mail and by overnight mail, and (2) promptly file proof of such service on the docket. Counsel for Respondents shall promptly enter notices of appearance. Within three calendar days of service, Respondents are ORDERED TO RESPOND to the Petition and are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE as to why the Petition should not be granted. Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondents SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. (agryan)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by attorney Alec Bracken. The document was scanned and not converted directly to portable document format (PDF). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - future documents must be filed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 1.3(f) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-10948082)Attorney Alec S. Bracken added to party Argenis Jesus Villalobos-Perez(pty:pet), filed by Argenis Jesus Villalobos-Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Bracken, Alec) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
