Martinez-Caicedo v. Facility Administrator
| Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo |
| Facility Administrator |
| 1:2026cv01733 |
| April 23, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 3 Case Assigned (pro se) to Judge, #2 MOTION for Review, #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Addressed to Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo. (echa, ) |
| Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Petitioner Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo. Only Plaintiff consents. (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 15 Returned USPS Certified Mail Receipt re: #8 Certificate of Service Addressed to United States Attorney General (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 13 RESPONSE to 7 Order,,,,,,,, Amended Order to Show Cause by Respondent Facility Administrator. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Decl. of S. Blea)(Prochazka, Julia) |
| Filing 14 Returned USPS Certified Mail Receipt re: #8 Certificate of Service Addressed to ICE Aurora Contract Detention Facility. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Clarify. Noting that on April 27, 2026, the Clerk of the Court emailed the Civil Docketing Clerk at the U.S. Attorney's Office with copies of the #1 Petition and 7 Order to Show Cause, the Court finds that this constitutes service and dismisses the portion of the 7 Order to Show Cause relating to service by certified mail. Therefore, Respondents' April 30, 2026, deadline to respond is extended by four days to May 4, 2026. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(rmrja)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Clarify re 7 Order,,,,,,,, regarding Service of Process by Respondent Facility Administrator. (Prochazka, Julia) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Julia M. Prochazka on behalf of Facility Administrator Attorney Julia M. Prochazka added to party Facility Administrator (pty:res) (Prochazka, Julia) |
| Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER on behalf of the Office of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado Re: #8 Certificate of Service (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re: Service of Process re: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 7 Amended Order. (Attachments: #1 Certified mail receipts)(ccuen, ) |
|
Filing 7
AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Upon review of the #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, it is ORDERED that Petitioner shall SERVE Respondent with a copy of the #1 Petition and #2 Emergency Motion for Expedited Review, and accompanying papers, along with a copy of this Order, and #6 Magistrate Judge Consent Form by certified mail, on or before 5/1/2026. Petitioner shall promptly file proof of such service on the docket, and counsel for Respondent shall promptly enter their notice of appearance. Within three calendar days of service, Respondent shall RESPOND to the Motion and SHOW CAUSE why the Petition shall not be granted. See, e.g., Yassine v. Collins, No. 1:25-cv-00786-ADA-SH, 2025 WL 1954064, at *1 (W.D. Tex. July 7, 2025) (explaining that while 2243 refers to a three day deadline, this requirement is "subordinate to the district court's authority to set deadlines" itself, and granting respondents a fourteen day deadline to respond in order to "give [r]espondents adequate time to brief the issues" (quotations omitted)). Petitioner shall file a reply within three calendar days after Respondents' response is filed. Pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. 1651(a), and in order to preserve the Court's jurisdiction, Respondent SHALL NOT REMOVE Petitioner from the District of Colorado or the United States unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this Order. See also Vizguerra-Ramirez v. Choate, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-881, D. Colo., ECF No. 11 at 45 (collecting cases); F.T.C. v. Dean Foods Co., 384 U.S. 597, 603 (1966); Local 1814, Int'l Longshoremen's Ass'n v. New York Shipping Assn, 965 F.2d 1224, 1237 (2d Cir. 1992). SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/27/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (anewt,) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DRAWING CASE. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/27/2026. (Case randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-1733-RMR.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. ORDERED that Respondent show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of Respondent' s answer Applicant may file a reply. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/27/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 Emergency MOTION for Expedited Review by Petitioner Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 117787), filed by Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope, #3 Envelope, #4 Receipt)(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martinez-Caicedo v. Facility Administrator | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eiler David Martinez-Caicedo | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Facility Administrator | |
| Represented By: | Julia M. Prochazka |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
