Moreno (PS) v. Nizer et al
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Eliana Moreno
Defendant: Christine E. Nizer, Shafiq Rahman, Natalie Evans Harris and Katie Olson Savage
Case Number: 1:2026cv01799
Filed: April 27, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Richard T Gurley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2026 Filing 18 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #17 Notice of Appeal filed by Rosalyn Eliana Moreno to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid, IFP status on appeal denied in final order,) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record) (pklin, )
June 22, 2026 Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEAL to FEDERAL CIRCUIT as to #16 Judgment, #15 Order, by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (pklin, )
June 15, 2026 Filing 16 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #15 Order on 06/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
June 15, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/15/2026. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judges Recommendation (ECF No. #14 ) are overruled. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. #13 ) is accepted and adopted. The Complaint (ECF No. #6 ) and the action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
June 11, 2026 Filing 14 Plaintiff's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation #13 filed by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (pklin, )
June 8, 2026 Filing 13 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. RECOMMENDED that the Complaint (ECF No. #6 ) and the action be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) (i). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, )
June 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/5/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt, )
June 4, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Minute Order by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/04/2026. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (This case is directly reassigned to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01799-LTB.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
June 3, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #5 ) is GRANTED. The previously-filed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/3/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (anewt,)
May 27, 2026 Filing 9 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically or Via Video Conference by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (pklin, )
May 27, 2026 Filing 8 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Consideration by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (pklin, )
May 27, 2026 Filing 7 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Nationwide Protective Order by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (pklin, )
May 27, 2026 Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Natalie Evans Harris, Christine E. Nizer, Shafiq Rahman, Katie Olson Savage, filed by Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (Attached motions, pages 9-21 docketed separately below.) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment 1) (pklin, )
May 27, 2026 Filing 5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (pklin, )
May 5, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Order Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 05/05/2026. Ordered that Plaintiff shall cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
April 27, 2026 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (angar, )
April 27, 2026 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), by Plaintiff Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (angar, )
April 27, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Demand for Jury Trial against Natalie Evans Harris, Christine E. Nizer, Shafiq Rahman, Katie Olson Savage, filed by Rosalyn Eliana Moreno. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Continuation of Main Document)(angar, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moreno (PS) v. Nizer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalyn Eliana Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine E. Nizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shafiq Rahman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Natalie Evans Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Katie Olson Savage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?