Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. et al
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. |
| Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. doing business as Drunken Monkeys, Tony Leyba, Janelle Yvonne Leyba and Drunken Monkeys |
| 1:2026cv01864 |
| April 30, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0605 Cable Comm:Unauthorized publication or use of comm |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER This matter comes before this Court upon its own motion. The Status Conference that is set on October 19, 2026 is vacated. by Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara on 10/19/2026. Text Only Entry (tpolc1, )
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Defendants Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. d/b/a Drunken Monkeys, Tony Leyba, and Janelle Yvonne Leyba by Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Joseph P. Hand, III, #2 Garcia vs. Romero Rate Card, #3 Canelo vs. Scull Rate Card, #4 Paul vs. Chavez Jr. Rate Card, #5 UFC 2025 Rate Card, #6 Affidavit of Sean Maguire, #7 Declaration of Ryan R. Janis, #8 Exhibit A - Advertisements, #9 Exhibit B - Additional Advertisements, #10 Exhibit C - Liquor License, #11 Exhibit D - Westworld.com Article, #12 Exhibit E - Process Service Invoices, #13 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Janis, Ryan) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER re #9 Clerk's Entry of Default. To the extent Plaintiff intends to file a motion for default judgment, that motion shall be filed on or before August 31, 2026. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 7/30/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER. This matter comes before this Court upon its own motion. Noting the entry of defaults against the Defendants [ECF 10 ], this Court CONVERTS the Scheduling Conference on October 19, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. (Mountain Time) in Courtroom C- 402, on the fourth floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, 80294, to a Status Conference. Out-of-state counsel may appear remotely via video teleconference by using the Cisco Meeting App Instructions provided at ECF #8 . By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 7/30/2026. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 10 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Janelle Yvonne Leyba, Tony Leyba, Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. re #9 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co., Tony Leyba, and Janelle Yvonne Leyba, by Clerk. Text Only Entry (sphil, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Entry of Default as to Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co., Tony Leyba, and Janelle Yvonne Leyba by Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Janis, Ryan) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara on 06/15/2026. Pursuant to the Order of Reference, this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on October 19, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-402, on the fourth floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado, 80294. No later than seven days before the Scheduling Conference, the Parties shall (1) file their Proposed Scheduling Order onto the case docket sheet and (2) submit the proposed Scheduling Order in Word format by joint email, copying all Parties, to Chambers at o'[email protected]. (agryan)
|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. Janelle Yvonne Leyba served on 6/3/2026, answer due 6/24/2026; Tony Leyba served on 6/3/2026, answer due 6/24/2026; Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. served on 6/3/2026, answer due 6/24/2026. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(Janis, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/6/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/6/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONSES issued by Clerk on 5/5/2026. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (angar, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (angar, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P. OHara. Text Only Entry (angar, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Janelle Yvonne Leyba, Tony Leyba, Tecolote Ltd. Liability Co. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10984149)Attorney Ryan Richard Janis added to party Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Janis, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
