Tomlinson v. Garcia
| Travis Tomlinson |
| Amber Garcia |
| 1:2026cv01911 |
| May 3, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Travis Tomlinson. (Schielke, Sarah) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Travis Tomlinson All parties do not consent.. (Schielke, Sarah) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Travis Tomlinson. Amber Garcia waiver sent on 5/15/2026, answer due 7/14/2026. (Schielke, Sarah) |
Filing 5
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 6/30/2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 5/12/2026. (evaug)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/7/26. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
|
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (angar, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry (angar, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Amber Garcia (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10988599)Attorney Sarah J. Schielke added to party Travis Tomlinson(pty:pla), filed by Travis Tomlinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schielke, Sarah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tomlinson v. Garcia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Travis Tomlinson | |
| Represented By: | Sarah J. Schielke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Amber Garcia | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
