USA v. City and County of Denver, Colorado et al
| USA |
| Denver Police Department and City and County of Denver, Colorado |
| 1:2026cv01929 |
| May 5, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Timothy P O'Hara |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Joint STATUS REPORT regarding scheduling conference by Plaintiff USA. (Todd, Patrick) |
Filing 20
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 6/5/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond All Defendants: Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Extend the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #15 . Defendants seek an extension until July 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. The Motion indicates that, based on the parties' required conferral, Plaintiff doesn't dispute an extension until June 29, 2026, but does dispute an extension until July 23, 2026.The Court finds good cause to grant an extension until July 23, 2026--a difference of 24 days from the extension Plaintiff does not oppose. The Moton is GRANTED. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(d) ("Nothing in this rule precludes a judicial officer from ruling on a motion at any time after it is filed.").Defendants shall have through and including July 23, 2026, to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.By Judge S. Kato Crews on 06/04/2026. Text Only Entry (Crews, S.)
|
|
Filing 18
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent form [ECF #17 ] filed by the Parties expressing non-consent under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c) (8), the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to reassign this case under D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a) to a District Judge. This Court may continue on the case to hear matters referred by the district judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1(c). By Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara on 6/4/2026. (Case randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01929-SKC). (anewt,)
|
| Filing 17 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff USA All parties do not consent.. (Todd, Patrick) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara on 6/2/2026. This matter comes before the Court upon Defendants' Motion to Extend the Deadline to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint #15 . The Court sets the following expedited briefing schedule on the Motion #15 : Plaintiff's response is due on or before June 9, 2026. Defendants may file a reply on or before June 12, 2026. Noting that Defendants indicate Plaintiff would be amenable to a three-week extension (i.e., to June 29, 2026), see #15 at 4, Defendants' June 8, 2026 responsive pleading deadline is hereby stayed, pending the Parties' briefing on the issue. The Court will set a new deadline with its resolution of the Motion. Text Only Entry (tpolc2, )
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendants City and County of Denver, Colorado, Denver Police Department. (Taylor, William) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Janet Rhiannon Carter on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Janet Rhiannon Carter added to party City and County of Denver, Colorado(pty:dft), Attorney Janet Rhiannon Carter added to party Denver Police Department(pty:dft) (Carter, Janet) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by William James Taylor, Jr on behalf of All Defendants Attorney William James Taylor, Jr added to party City and County of Denver, Colorado(pty:dft), Attorney William James Taylor, Jr added to party Denver Police Department(pty:dft) (Taylor, William) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USA. Denver Police Department served on 5/18/2026, answer due 6/8/2026. (Todd, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by USA. City and County of Denver, Colorado served on 5/18/2026, answer due 6/8/2026. (Todd, Patrick) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Barry K. Arrington on behalf of USA (Arrington, Barry) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (agryan) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Austin Harold Artz on behalf of USAAttorney Austin Harold Artz added to party USA(pty:pla) (Artz, Austin) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER. The above captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge OHara pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form [ECF #3 ] on or before June 8, 2026. The Court notes that Plaintiff's sole cause of action is a legal challenge seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. ECF #1 46-48. Within 30 days of counsel entering appearances on behalf of Defendants, the Parties shall confer and file a Joint Status Report stating whether the Parties anticipate the need to hold a Scheduling Conference in this matter. By Magistrate Judge Timothy P. O'Hara on 5/8/2026. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Denver Police Department by Plaintiff USA. (Todd, Patrick) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS REQUEST as to City and County of Denver by Plaintiff USA. (Todd, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Patrick Daniel Todd on behalf of USAAttorney Patrick Daniel Todd added to party USA(pty:pla) (Todd, Patrick) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No Summons Issued. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Timothy P O'Hara. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City and County of Denver, Denver Police Department Attorney Barry K. Arrington added to party United States of America(pty:dft), filed by United States of America.(Arrington, Barry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
