Engvall et al v. Wheeler
| Emelie Engvall and Ryan Markey |
| Scott Wheeler |
| 1:2026cv01954 |
| May 6, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| S Kato Crews |
| Susan Prose |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 06/01/2026. Proposed scheduling order (including a copy in Word format to # [email protected]) due July 7, 2026. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held on July 14, 2026, at 3:30 p.m. Parties wishing to attend in person may appear in Courtroom A-502, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Parties are permitted to attend telephonically by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. Any telephonic attendees are requested to mute their phone when not speaking, as well as avoid speakerphone and Bluetooth connections. (sjeff)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 6/1/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Case randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-01954-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Scott Wheeler All parties do not consent.. (Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #4 Complaint and Jury Demand by Scott Wheeler.(Volker, Luke) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Todd R. Scardina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Todd R. Scardina added to party Emelie Engvall(pty:pla), Attorney Todd R. Scardina added to party Ryan Markey(pty:pla) (Scardina, Todd) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (echa, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose.Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 6 STATE COURT ORDER GRANTING Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Complaint By District Court Judge Keri Yoder on 2/23/2026. (echa, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Complaint, Cover Sheet, Summons upon Scott Wheeler on 4/20/2026. (echa, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Scott Wheeler, filed by Emelie Engvall, Ryan Markey.(echa, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Scott Wheeler from San Miguel District Court, Case Number 2025CV30029. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10995087), filed by Scott Wheeler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Exhibit B - Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C - Summons, Scott Wheeler, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D - Motion for Extension of Time, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E - Affidavit of Service, Wheeler, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F - Order Granting Motion for Extension of Time, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G - Signed Domicile Statement)(Volker, Luke) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
