Sundberg v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Patricia Sundberg
Defendant: Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2026cv01956
Filed: May 6, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Cyrus Y Chung
Referring Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 (i)(3) Breach of Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to the Order of Reference, this Court will hold the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference on July 29, 2026 at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-201, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. It is ORDERED that Defendant shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the scheduling conference. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than seven days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at #[email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 5/14/2026. (echa, )
May 13, 2026 Filing 12 ANSWER to #6 Complaint and Jury Demand by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company.(Newton, Emmett)
May 11, 2026 Filing 11 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/11/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
May 11, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/11/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
May 8, 2026 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (dhern, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 8 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry. (dhern, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service of District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint, Complaint, Summons, upon Helena Erbe on 4/15/2026. (dhern, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, filed by Patricia Sundberg.(dhern, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (dhern, )
May 6, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Caitlin Curley on behalf of Patricia SundbergAttorney Caitlin Curley added to party Patricia Sundberg(pty:pla) (Curley, Caitlin)
May 6, 2026 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Emmett Newton on behalf of Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyAttorney Emmett Newton added to party Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Newton, Emmett)
May 6, 2026 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent The Allstate Corporation for Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. (Wagner, Rebecca)
May 6, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company from Jefferson County District Court, Case Number 2026CV30642. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10995800), filed by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Summons, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Civil Case Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint, #4 Exhibit A-State Court Division 1 Civil Procedure Order, #5 Exhibit A-State Court Affidavit of Service, #6 Exhibit B-Registered Voter Information, #7 Exhibit C-Traffic Accident Report, #8 Exhibit D-Colorado Secretary of State Periodic Report, #9 Register of Actions, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Wagner, Rebecca)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sundberg v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Sundberg
Represented By: Caitlin Curley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Rebecca Kirsten Wagner
Represented By: Emmett Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?