Mendez (PS) v. Stoller et al
Plaintiff: Kristen Mendez
Defendant: Jack Stoller and Dawn Hill-Kearse
Case Number: 1:2026cv02060
Filed: May 11, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2026 Filing 8 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #7 Order Dismissing Case on 7/1/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
July 1, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/1/2026. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order and failure to prosecute. IFP on appeal is DENIED without prejudice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
May 29, 2026 Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,, Addressed to Kristen Mendez. (sphil, )
May 28, 2026 Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs., 3 Case Assigned (pro se) to Judge, #1 Complaint Addressed to Kristen Mendez. (echa, )
May 14, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is denied without prejudice with leave to refile on the proper court-approved form, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 5/14/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(eluce, )
May 11, 2026 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (dhern, )
May 11, 2026 Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Kristen Mendez. (dhern, )
May 11, 2026 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Dawn Hill-Kearse, Jack Stoller, filed by Kristen Mendez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dhern, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mendez (PS) v. Stoller et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Mendez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jack Stoller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dawn Hill-Kearse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?