Taylor v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
| Troye Dwain Taylor |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. and Facebook |
| 1:2026cv02111 |
| May 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Susan Prose |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. All parties do not consent.. (Wasserman, Emily) |
Filing 14
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on July 1, 2026. Before the court is Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer. The court observes that Defendant filed its #11 Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2026, which was the deadline for its Answer. Accordingly, the court DENIES AS MOOT Defendants #7 Motion for Extension. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (sbplc11)
|
| Filing 13 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue filed by Meta Platforms, Inc. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. By District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on May 26, 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (gpglc3) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Wasserman, Emily) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint or, Alternatively, to Transfer Venue by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Michael Duffey in Support of Meta Platforms' Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit A to Declaration of Michael Duffey in Support of Meta Platforms' Motion to Dismiss)(Wasserman, Emily) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically- referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court levsponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 5/19/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry. (eluce)
|
| Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER DRAWING CASE. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. (Case randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P. Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for all further proceedings. All future pleadings shall be designated to 26-cv- 02111-GPG). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 5/19/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #4 Complaint by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Wasserman, Emily) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 5 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint by Denver County District Judge Ian J. Kellogg on 5/6/2026. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT for Breach Contract/Promise and Petition for Injunctive Relive against Meta Platforms, Inc., filed by Troye Dwain Taylor.(agarc, ) |
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE State Court Docket Sheet by Defendant Meta Platforms, Inc. (Wasserman, Emily) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Meta Platforms, Inc. from District Court, Denver County, Case Number 2026cv000304. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-11016644), filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit 3 - State Court Delay Reduction Order, #5 Exhibit 4 - State Court Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint, #6 Exhibit 5 - State Court Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint)(Wasserman, Emily) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
