Dews v. Pilot Catastrophe
| Madison Dews |
| Pilot Catastrophe |
| 1:2026cv02219 |
| May 20, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 (e)(2)-(o)(t) - Job Discrimination (Other) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter from Madison Dews re deficiencies. (pklin, ) |
Filing 7
Second order Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/23/2026. Ordered that Plaintiff shall cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. However, Plaintiff is warned that, even if the action is dismissed without prejudice, the dismissal may act as a dismissal with prejudice if the statute of limitations for filing expires. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 6 Amended Employment Discrimination Complaint against Pilot Catastrophe, filed by Madison Dews. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Madison Dews. (pklin, ) |
|
Filing 4
Order Directing Plaintiff To Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 05/21/2026. Ordered that Plaintiff shall cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. Plaintiff is warned that, even if the action is dismissed without prejudice, the dismissal may act as a dismissal with prejudice if the statute of limitations for filing expires. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Madison Dews. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc., filed by Madison Dews. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(jberr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dews v. Pilot Catastrophe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Madison Dews | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pilot Catastrophe | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
