Rowley v. Shivley et al
| Kristine Rowley |
| Stephanie Shivley, Kenneth Shivley, Michelle M Moltz Access Trust and Eric L Moltz Access Trust |
| 1:2026cv02245 |
| May 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Complaint, filed by attorney Keller Andrew Caubarreaux. Attorney has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, signature to all future documents. (Text Only Entry) (jberr, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11030895)Attorney Keller Andrew Caubarreaux added to party Kristine Rowley(pty:pla), filed by Kristine Rowley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Caubarreaux, Keller) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
