Black v. Pronomix.AI LLC
Plaintiff: Tony Black
Defendant: Pronomix.AI LLC
Case Number: 1:2026cv02248
Filed: May 22, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Cyrus Y Chung
Referring Judge: Gordon P Gallagher
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 07/07/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
July 7, 2026 Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent, therefore, this case is randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher, and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for all future proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02248-GPG. (Text Only Entry) (agryan)
July 7, 2026 Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Pronomix.AI LLC All parties do not consent.. (Sperber, Susan)
July 7, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Minute Order: This matter is before the Court on correspondence from the parties. The Scheduling Conference set for July 30, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. is RESET to August 13, 2026 at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom C201 beforeMagistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung.The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form, ECF No. #9 , on or before July 30, 2026.It is further ORDERED that counsel for the Parties and any unrepresented non-prisoner Parties in this case are to hold a meeting in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before July 23, 2026and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), only requests pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 may be submitted before the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the Court. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(b)(2)(A), responses to such discovery requests must be submitted no later than thirty days after the Rule 26(f) meeting, unless the Parties stipulate or the Court orders otherwise.The Proposed Scheduling Order is due on or before August 6, 2026. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerks Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (ECF) Procedures. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at [email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 7/7/2026. Text Only Entry (spric)
June 22, 2026 Filing 13 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Claim for Relief by Defendant Pronomix.AI LLC. (Sperber, Susan)
June 22, 2026 Filing 12 ANSWER to #7 Complaint by Pronomix.AI LLC.(Sperber, Susan)
May 27, 2026 Filing 11 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Pronomix.AI LLC. Pronomix.AI LLC answer due 6/19/2026. (Sperber, Susan)
May 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER: The Parties shall complete and file the Magistrate Judge Consent Form, ECF No. #9 , on or before July 16, 2026. It is further ORDERED that the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference will be held before this Court on July 30, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-201, on the second floor of the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse located at 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. The Parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures, no later than seven days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in Word format by email to Magistrate Judge Chung at #[email protected]. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 5/26/2026. (echa, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 9 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (eguth, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 8 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (eguth, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 7 COMPLAINT against Pronomix.AI LLC, filed by Tony Black.(eguth, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 6 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #4 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Brian E. Hefner. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through PACER pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). (Text Only Entry) (eguth, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 5 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (eguth, )
May 22, 2026 Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brian E. Hefner on behalf of Tony BlackAttorney Brian E. Hefner added to party Tony Black(pty:pla) (Hefner, Brian)
May 22, 2026 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Sperber, Susan)
May 22, 2026 Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing of State Court Records by Defendant Pronomix.AI LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Records)(Sperber, Susan)
May 22, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Pronomix.AI LLC from District Court, Douglas County, Colorado, Case Number 2026CV30433. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-11031185), filed by Pronomix.AI LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Sperber, Susan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Black v. Pronomix.AI LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Black
Represented By: Brian E. Hefner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pronomix.AI LLC
Represented By: Susan S. Sperber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?