Killings v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.
| Sara N. Killings |
| Sterling Infosystems, Inc. |
| 1:2026cv02331 |
| May 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| S Kato Crews |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/18/2027. No later than ten (10) days after the close of discovery, a party intending to file a motion for summary judgment must meaningfully confer with the opposing party and jointly email [email protected] to set a pre-motion Status Conference with the Court. If no party seeks to file a motion for summary judgment, Counsel shall email chambers to obtain a date for Final Pretrial Conference. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 7/22/2026. (evaug)
|
| Filing 22 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Sara N. Killings. (Franz, Ashlie) |
| Filing 21 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Sara N. Killings All parties do not consent.. (Franz, Ashlie) |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Sara N. Killings. Sterling Infosystems, Inc. waiver sent on 6/23/2026, answer due 8/24/2026. (Franz, Ashlie) |
| Filing 19 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sterling Infosystems, Inc., filed by Sara N. Killings.(Franz, Ashlie) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER This matter is before the Court on #17 Notice of Filing First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall separately file a clean copy of the First Amended Complaint by June 24, 2026. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 6/23/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading re #8 Complaint by Plaintiff Sara N. Killings (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Proposed Amended Complaint (Redline), #2 Exhibit 2- Proposed Amended Complaint (Clean))(Franz, Ashlie) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/20/2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 6/4/2026. (evaug)
|
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Trent Alan Wallace on behalf of Sara N. KillingsAttorney Trent Alan Wallace added to party Sara N. Killings(pty:pla) (Wallace, Trent) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant First Advantage Background Services Corp.. First Advantage Background Services Corp. answer due 6/3/2026. (McDonald, Esther) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE re #1 Notice of Removal, by Defendant First Advantage Background Services Corp. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Summons, #3 Notice of Removal, #4 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #5 State Court Docket)(McDonald, Esther) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE ENCOURAGING CONSIDERATION OF CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION: This district's magistrate judges play a crucial role in the work and structure of the district court and the administration of justice. Under Local Rule 72.2, the parties have the option to consent to their case being presided over by a magistrate judge instead of a district judge. This court encourages parties to meaningfully confer and consider consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. There are many benefits to consenting. One such benefit is having a single judicial officer preside over every aspect of your case rather than two. A second benefit is the certainty of not having your trial date vacated when set before a magistrate judge. District judges preside over felony criminal cases and those cases receive priority over civil cases because of a criminal defendant's speedy trial rights. Magistrate judges do not preside over felony criminal cases, and therefore, they do not have to vacate civil trials because of criminal cases. If the parties do not choose to consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction, they should keep in mind Local Rule 72.3. Under this rule, the parties may consent to the final determination of a dispositive motion (motion for summary judgment or motion to dismiss) by the assigned magistrate judge by filing a notice of consent for that motion. Please refer to Local Rule 72.3 for more information on that option. Consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction is voluntary, and no adverse consequence will result if one or more parties decline to consent. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/28/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/28/2026. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
|
| Filing 10 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (dhern, ) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Ashlie Kaylene Franz on behalf of Sara N. KillingsAttorney Ashlie Kaylene Franz added to party Sara N. Killings(pty:pla) (Franz, Ashlie) |
| Filing 9 Case assigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 8 COMPLAINT against First Advantage Background Services Corp., filed by Sara N. Killings.(dhern, ) |
| Filing 7 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (dhern, ) |
| Filing 6 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE to filer of non-compliance with Notice of Removal case opening procedures. Pursuant to Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1, and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a, each of the state court documents shall be individual PDFs. See Appendix B Notice of Removal in the User Guide - Attorney Case Opening Procedures document. (Text Only Entry.) (dhern, ) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Demand for Jury Trial by Plaintiff Sara N. Killings (Osborne, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Ross Osborne on behalf of Sara N. KillingsAttorney Matthew Ross Osborne added to party Sara N. Killings(pty:pla) (Osborne, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent First Advantage Corporation for First Advantage Background Services Corp.. (McDonald, Esther) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by First Advantage Background Services Corp. from District Court of El Paso County, Case Number 2026CV031008. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-11038657), filed by First Advantage Background Services Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McDonald, Esther) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Killings v. First Advantage Background Services Corp. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sara N. Killings | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Ross Osborne |
| Represented By: | Trent Alan Wallace |
| Represented By: | Ashlie Kaylene Franz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sterling Infosystems, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Esther Slater McDonald |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
