Cordova v. Denver Contract Detention Facility et al
| Michel Alexander Cordova |
| George Valdez, Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin and Todd B. |
| 1:2026cv02393 |
| May 29, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Certified Mail Receipt Return of Service re #7 Certificate of Service upon Markwayne Mullin.(jrobe, ) |
| Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. Case randomly reassigned to Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02393-DDD. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 12 Certified Mail Receipt Return of Service re #7 Certificate of Service upon Todd Lyons. (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Todd B., Todd Lyons, Markwayne Mullin, George Valdez All parties do not consent.. (Jafek, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 Certified Mail Receipt of Service re #7 Certificate of Service upon George Valdez. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECEIPT RETURN by United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado. (echa, ) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Order to Show Cause for Service of Process. (Attachments: #1 USPS certified mail receipts) (jrobe, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND FILE ELECTION CONCERNING CONSENT it is ORDERED that Respondents show cause within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. It isFURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of Respondents' answer Petitioner may file a reply. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form (ECF No. #5 ), indicating either the unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined, by July 6, 2026. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 06/11/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (echa, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DRAWING CASE by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/3/2026. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be drawn to a presiding judge. (Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02393-MDB). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (echa, )
|
| Filing 3 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 118244 (anewt,) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Michel Alexander Cordova. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(manoe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.