Pena Trujillo v. Baltazar et al
| Miguel Pena Trujillo |
| Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Tod Lyons and Attorney General |
| 1:2026cv02429 |
| June 1, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 29, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #18 Order Addressed to Miguel Pena Trujillo. (dhern, ) |
| Filing 20 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #16 Certificate of Service Addressed to Miguel Pena Trujillo. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #18 Order on 7/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (schap, ) |
Filing 18
ORDER denying #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/8/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (schap, )
|
| Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 13 Order on Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge, Addressed to Miguel Pena Trujillo. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 16 RETURN Certified Mail Receipt of Service upon Director of U.S. ICE (eluce, ) |
| Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #7 Affidavit/Return of Service Addressed to Miguel Pena Trujillo. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable Addressed to Miguel Pena Trujillo re #1 , 2 . (pklin, ) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER OF REFERENCE. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73, Local Civil Rules 40.1(c)(6) and 72.2, and #12 Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, this action is REFERRED for final disposition to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak, who will conduct any and all further proceedings and order the entry of judgment in the case. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/15/2026. Text Only Entry. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (agryan)
|
| Filing 12 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Respondents Attorney General, Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Tod Lyons All parties consent.. (Winstead, Edwin) |
| Filing 11 RETURN Certified Mail Receipt of Service upon Robert Hagan on 6/9/2026. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 10 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re #5 by Respondents Attorney General, Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Tod Lyons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Winstead, Edwin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Edwin Garreth Winstead, III on behalf of Attorney General, Juan Baltazar, Robert Hagan, Tod LyonsAttorney Edwin Garreth Winstead, III added to party Attorney General(pty:res), Attorney Edwin Garreth Winstead, III added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Edwin Garreth Winstead, III added to party Robert Hagan(pty:res), Attorney Edwin Garreth Winstead, III added to party Tod Lyons(pty:res) (Winstead, Edwin) |
| Filing 8 USPS Certified Mail Receipts re: #6 Certificate of Service (sphil, ) |
| Filing 7 Acknowledgment of Service on behalf of the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Colorado re: #6 Certificate of Service on 6/4/2026. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service, by Clerk of Court re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order to Show Cause for Service of Process. (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 6/4/2026. Respondents must show cause within seven (7) days from the date of this Order why the Application (ECF No. 1) should not be granted. ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of Respondents' answer to this Order to Show Cause, Petitioner may file a reply. ORDERED that within seven (7) days form the date of this Order the parties shall complete and file the Election Concerning Consent/Non-Consent to United States Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction form (ECF No. 4), indicating either theunanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (pklin, ) |
|
Filing 3
Order Drawing Case by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/03/2026. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that this case shall be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. (This case is randomly reassigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02429-STV.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (jberr, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number 118238), filed by Miguel Pena Trujillo. (Attachments: #1 Index, #2 Attachment, #3 Attachment, #4 Attachment, #5 Attachment, #6 Envelope) (jberr, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
