Rodriguez v. Arvizu et al
| Mikel Isreal Rodriguez |
| Noe Arvizu, Joshua Gardner, Chad Dickson, Jeffrey Ma and Colorado Spring Police Department |
| 1:2026cv02553 |
| June 8, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/10/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. [Copy mailed as ordered]. (echa, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Mikel Isreal Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Noe Arvizu, Colorado Spring Police Department, Chad Dickson, Joshua Gardner, Jeffrey Ma, filed by Mikel Isreal Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ggill, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
