Castillo Murga v. Mullin
Petitioner: Daniel Alexander Castillo Murga
Respondent: Markwayne Mullin
Case Number: 1:2026cv02602
Filed: June 11, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Cause of Action: 25 U.S.C. ยง 1303 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2026 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11074663)Attorney Jonathon Gregory Bell added to party Daniel Alexander Castillo Murga(pty:pet), filed by Daniel Alexander Castillo Murga. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit NTA, #2 Exhibit I-213)(Bell, Jonathon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castillo Murga v. Mullin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Daniel Alexander Castillo Murga
Represented By: Jonathon Gregory Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Markwayne Mullin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?