Molt (PS) v. Helton
| Adam J. Molt |
| Catherine Mitchell Helton |
| 1:2026cv02665 |
| June 15, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 dp - Fed. Question - Violation of Due Process |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 Order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. #8 ) is accepted and adopted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the "Complaint for Injunctive Relief (No Money Damages)" (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Emergency Motion for Temporary RestrainingOrder" (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 07/17/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 8
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE it is respectfullyRECOMMENDED that the "Complaint for Injunctive Relief (No Money Damages)" (ECF No. 1) and the action be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the "Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order" (ECF No. 2) be denied as moot. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/24/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/23/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 6
Minute Order by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/22/2026. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (This case is directly reassigned to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 26-cv-02665-LTB.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
|
Filing 5
Order Granting Leave To Proceed Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/22/2026. ORDERED that the "Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO 240)" (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. The United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining Defendants for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge and/or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (AO 240). by Plaintiff Adam J. Molt. (manoe, ) |
| Filing 2 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Adam J. Molt. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1)(manoe, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine Mitchell Helton, filed by Adam J. Molt. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 complaint copy)(manoe, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Molt (PS) v. Helton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Adam J. Molt | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Catherine Mitchell Helton | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
