Dumas et al v. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company
| Stephanie Dumas and Stephen Boland |
| Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company |
| 1:2026cv02779 |
| June 22, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company All parties do not consent.. (Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE Concerning Plaintiffs' Failure to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Stephanie Esther Boutsicaris on behalf of Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyAttorney Stephanie Esther Boutsicaris added to party Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Boutsicaris, Stephanie) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint by Defendant Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company answer due 7/13/2026. (Kust, Katherine) |
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 6/24/2026. Text Only Entry (nywlc8, )
|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (eguth, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 6 STATE COURT ORDER Granting Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. By Michael Kotlarczyk, District Court Judge, Boulder County on 6/10/2026. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of District Court Civil (CV) Case Cover Sheet for Initial Pleading of Complaint, Counterclaim, Cross-Claim or Third Party Complaint and Jury Demand, District Court Civil Summons, and Complaint and Jury Demand upon Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company on 5/20/2026 (eguth, ) |
| Filing 4 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company, filed by Stephanie Dumas, Stephen Boland.(eguth, ) |
| Filing 3 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company from District Court Denver County Colorado, Case Number 2026CV30365. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-11091289), filed by Garrison Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Summons, #4 Exhibit D - Summons, #5 Exhibit E - Garrison UMEOT to Respond to Complaint, #6 Exhibit F - Order Granting Garrison UMEOT to Respond to Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Voter Registration Summary, #8 Exhibit H - Colorado Secretary of State Summary for Garrison, #9 Exhibit I - Demand)(Kust, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
