Nwosu (PS) v. Denver Police Department, The et al
| Adaeze Nwosu |
| Denver Police Department, The, Kristen Johnson, Trailfinder, Inc, Andew Scott, Lucas Stewart, Task Rabbit, Inc, Aspen Eckiss, Nick Tootalian and ABC Legal Services, LLC |
| 1:2026cv02881 |
| June 24, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Other Fraud |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (ECF No. #13 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Court's Order Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #3 ). It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days from the date of this Order, an amended complaint on the court-approved Complaint form. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion requesting e-filing privileges (ECF No. #9 ) is denied without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/5/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(ggill, )
|
| Filing 13 STRICKEN- FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against ABC Legal Services, LLC, Denver Police Department, The, Aspen Eckiss, Kristen Johnson, Andew Scott, Lucas Stewart, Task Rabbit, Inc, Nick Tootalian, Trailfinder, Inc, filed by Adaeze Nwosu. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Amended Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(ggill, ) Modified on 8/5/2026 to add stricken per #14 Order. (ggill, ). |
| Filing 12 Letter by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Pro Se Consent to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing Form by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu (agryan) |
| Filing 10 Filing fee: $405.00, receipt number 118599. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 9 Ex-Parte MOTION for CM/ECF E-filing privileges by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 8 Proposed Subpoena by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu. (ggill, ) |
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER. Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. #4 ) requesting e-filing privileges is denied without prejudice to Plaintiff following the proper procedure to be granted e-filing privileges. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 Summons(es) submitted will not be issued. Case is still under initial review. Text Only Entry. (angar, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/30/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS REQUEST by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons)(angar, ) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for CMECF E-Filing Privileges, by Plaintiff Adaeze Nwosu. (angar, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (angar, ) Modified on 6/30/2026 to correct date (angar, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Denver Police Department, The, Aspen Eckiss, Kristen Johnson, Andew Scott, Lucas Stewart, Task Rabbit, Inc, Nick Tootalian, Trailfinder, Inc, filed by Adaeze Nwosu.(angar, ) Modified on 6/30/2026 to correct filing date (angar, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.