Ramirez v. Baltazar et al
| Sebastian Rafael Ramirez |
| Juan Baltazar, David Venturella, Markwayne Mullin and Todd Blanche |
| 1:2026cv02883 |
| June 26, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #15 MOTION to Enforce Attorney Anh Weinberg added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Anh Weinberg added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Anh Weinberg added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Anh Weinberg added to party David Venturella(pty:res) filed by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella. (Weinberg, Anh) |
Filing 16
ORDER re: #15 Petitioner's Motion to Enforce Order. The respondents must respond to the motion on or before 8/20/2026. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 08/14/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Enforce by Petitioner Sebastian Rafael Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Villacis Flores, Eddy) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER re: #12 and #13 Status Reports filed by Respondents. The respondents report that the petitioner has been provided with a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The petitioner may file a response on or before 8/13/2026 explaining any reasons why this case should not be closed. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 08/06/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
|
| Filing 13 Second STATUS REPORT pursuant to the Court's July 28, 2026, Order (ECF No. 11) by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella. (Deuschle, Nicholas) |
| Filing 12 STATUS REPORT pursuant to the Court's July 28, 2026, Order (ECF No. 9) by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella. (Deuschle, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER GRANTING #1 Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.The petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus directing his immediate release from immigration detention or a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The respondents state that they "are not submitting a brief in opposition to the Petition," and they "recognize that the Court may then decide to grant the Petition and award appropriate relief." Doc. #8 at 1 2.It is therefore ORDERED that:5 Order to Show Cause is MADE ABSOLUTE, and #1 Verified Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED; andWithin one week of this Order, the respondents must provide the petitioner with a bond hearing before an immigration judge or else release the petitioner, and file a status report stating the results of any bond hearing that was conducted or the date of the petitioner's release if no bond hearing was held.The respondents must provide the petitioner's counsel no less than three business days' notice in advance of any bond hearing.At any bond hearing, the Government must bear the burden of proving that the petitioner is a flight risk by a preponderance of the evidence or a danger by clear and convincing evidence. See Hernandez-Lara v. Lyons, 10 F.4th 19, 40 (1st Cir. 2021); Kuzmic v. Baltasar, No. 26-cv-00577-CYC, 2026 WL 1291853, at *2, *5 (D. Colo. May 12, 2026); Guevara Gacia v. Bondi, No. 1:26-cv-01012-SKC, 2026 WL 835766, at *4 (D. Colo. Mar. 26, 2026); Barreno v. Baltasar, No. 025-cv-03017-GPG-TPO, 2025 WL 3190936, at *3 (D. Colo. Nov. 14, 2025); Diaz-Ceja v. McAleenan, No. 19-cv-00824-NYW, 2019 WL 2774211, at *11 to *12 (D. Colo. July 2, 2019); cf. United States v. Cisneros, 328 F.3d 610, 616 (10th Cir. 2003). #2 Petitioner's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction is DENIED AS MOOT.SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/28/2026. Text Only Entry.(agryan)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to 5 Order to Show Cause,,, by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David VenturellaAttorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Juan Baltazar(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Todd Blanche(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party Markwayne Mullin(pty:res), Attorney Nicholas Albert Deuschle added to party David Venturella(pty:res). (Deuschle, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time.The respondents must show cause on or before 7/27/2026 why #1 Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus should not be granted and respond to #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction by the same date.The petitioner may file a reply within two weeks of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 07/20/2026. Text Only Entry.(agryan)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Respondents Juan Baltazar, Todd Blanche, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella. (Puskar, Elizabeth) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Mailing/Service by Petitioner Sebastian Rafael Ramirez. (Villacis Flores, Eddy) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/30/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE.The petitioner must serve the respondents with #1 Verified Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. The petitioner need not serve a summons with a copy of the petition. The petitioner must promptly file proof of service in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(l)(1).Having reviewed the petition, I find that good cause appears, and it is therefore ORDERED that the respondents must SHOW CAUSE within two weeks after service of the petition why the application for a writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The respondents must also respond to #2 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and/or Preliminary Injunction by the same date.The petitioner may file a reply within one week of service of the response(s).SO ORDERED by Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 06/30/2026. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
|
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (agarc, ) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Chief Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Petitioner Sebastian Rafael Ramirez. (Villacis Flores, Eddy) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241 (Filing fee $ 5, Receipt Number ACODC-11105224)Attorney Eddy Ismael Villacis Flores added to party Sebastian Rafael Ramirez(pty:pet), filed by Sebastian Rafael Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Villacis Flores, Eddy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
