K-G Associates v. United States Forest Service et al
| K-G ASSOCIATES |
| United States Forest Service and Brian Glaspell |
| 1:2026cv03001 |
| July 2, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Robert E Blackburn |
| APA Review/Appeal |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jordan Patrick Cohen on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Jordan Patrick Cohen added to party Brian Glaspell(pty:dft), Attorney Jordan Patrick Cohen added to party United States Forest Service(pty:dft) (Cohen, Jordan) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PREPARATION OF JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 7/7/2026. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Robert E. Blackburn. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States Forest Service, White River National Forest (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-11118805)Attorney John Edward Lintzenich added to party K-G ASSOCIATES(pty:pla), filed by K-G ASSOCIATES. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, #3 Summons WHITE RIVER NATIONAL FOREST, BRIAN GLASPELL)(Lintzenich, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
